Other

Representation ID: 91485

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Beth Palmer

I feel Stratford upon Avon and district have more than met their quota for housing provision however this has not led to any improvement in any of the areas listed above in fact it appears to have had a detrimental effect

No

Representation ID: 91653

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

I think its unfair for you to ask me to comment and then ask for a summary. this process is already long and stressful.

No

Representation ID: 91734

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms miranda maloney

No. 9 How can we keep heritage when places like Mary Ardens farm will no longer exist due to over development of land around it?

No

Representation ID: 91810

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Jodie Keith

Objective 3: infrastructure enhancements should be prioritised before additional housing is built. The wording should be strengthened to reflect this as previous experience has shown housing development prioritised before necessary infrastructure to support the new houses. Current services are already beyond capacity e.g Warwick hospital, school intakes and GP wait lists.

Yes

Representation ID: 91833

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Shakespeare Line Rail User Group

Agent: Mr Terry Phillips

We fully support the Vision and Strategic Objectives, with the understanding that housing development must attract effective investment in key infrastructure. The Local Planning Authority and its elected members will need to ensure this, as anything less will undermine the SWLP's Vision and Strategic Objectives.

It is imperative that a significant modal shift in transportation takes place. This necessitates a change in approach by the Local Transport Authority, where roads are not the preferred or exclusive solution.

Yes

Representation ID: 91870

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

We broadly support the strategic objectives, but would note that objective 3 has tended not to be the case in the past, with houses being built first, and most infrastructure (eg medical facilities) following behind, and in some case (better public transport) not happening at all.

No

Representation ID: 91873

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not support

No

Representation ID: 91874

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not support

No

Representation ID: 91876

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not support

No

Representation ID: 92068

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ted and Zbigniew Jasinski

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 92100

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs cynthia bettany

it all sounds wonderful, but I can't see it happening when big swaths of green space are being considered for development. Current settlement areas being built at the moment have no character, too much sameness with no thought to building a community. Crime is rife, even in the countryside, an impossible task for our under staffed police force. Warehousing and industrial units are often large and unattractive.

Yes

Representation ID: 92105

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: General Aviation Awareness Council and Airfield Operators Group

The Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate

Yes

Representation ID: 92111

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Vincent

the devil will be in the details!

Other

Representation ID: 92139

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: T Cullum

I support the principles and strategic objectives with the below notes on objectives:

5. Bidford has an unused derelict building screaming out to be developed.
6. All new development should have renewable energy generation.
7. Already a policy but, regrettably, not enforced.
9. Must be done sympathetically and taking into account Objective 8
11. Need better and more reliable public transport. Buses should run later and be more frequent at peak times. They are worse at weekends. More services for rural settlements. Need better and safer cycling and pedestrian routes.
12. Consider this for the pockets of land around SG20.

Yes

Representation ID: 92148

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

N/A

No

Representation ID: 92169

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

The Vision and Objectives seem purely aspirational and naive. The expectation that all this will be achieved without problematic destruction of the landscape and reduction in agricultural land is grossly misguided. Thus any pretence that Warwickshire will be protected from being vastly suburbanised rather than enriching it for living or tourism.
Equally naive is the expectation that the infrastructure will meet the needs of the housing expansion.

Other

Representation ID: 92195

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Sara Burney

The proposal to build thousands of houses around South Warwickshire flies in the face of the Strategic Objectives set out above. You cannot say you're enriching tourism (9), maintaining attractive places (7), protecting heritage (etc) (8), and protecting and enhancing environmental assets (12) when you're proposing the creation of enormous housing estates on the greenbelt. This is not an effective use of land and natural resources (5). We also don't have the infrastructure (3) to cope with tens of thousands of new homes, which means these are not sustainable levels of growth (1). Development must be dispersed, not clustered.

No

Representation ID: 92197

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr William Bache

n/a

No

Representation ID: 92206

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Rebecca Johnson

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 92273

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: SolStar Power Limited

Agent: Enzygo

SolStar Power consider the new Local Plan Strategic Objectives have been strengthened from the adopted plan, to include the commitment to become a net zero carbon area. Further comments are provided in the attached letter (SHF.3100.001).

Yes

Representation ID: 92386

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Stuart Alford

The objectives at a high level here seem sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 92503

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Fairburn

Objective 3 includes ‘roads’ as required infrastructure. The council must consider the well-evidenced effect of Induced Traffic, when roads are built. New roads should prioritise bus and cycle lanes.
Objective 6. New developments be required to feature homes which have broadly south facing roofs wherever possible. The DNO should be required to provide connections which can accommodate exporting of power assuming all homes will have large solar arrays eventually.
Objective 8 - respect the local character– could stop homeowners putting external insulation on walls or installing solar panels. Such additions should be aesthetically pleasing, but they should be allowed.

No

Representation ID: 92540

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not agree or support these proposals

No

Representation ID: 92547

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr David Carr

As above

No

Representation ID: 92572

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: The Planning Bureau Ltd

To help meet the 'critical' need for Older Persons' Housing we propose adding the following wording to Strategic Objective 2: ... to meet the diverse need of our residents, including specialist (including housing suitable for older people such as retirement housing, housing with-care and care homes)

No

Representation ID: 92709

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Williams

Of course one must agree with the positive slant placed on many of these objectives, but it is difficult to reconcile objectives 5, 7, 8, 10 & 12 with the plan to create a huge conurbation south of Warwick and Leamington, from Barford in the west to Witnash in the east. The objectives simply contradict each other and are therefore meaningless.

No

Representation ID: 92719

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Adrian Hopkinson

Strategic objective 5 states ,Making effective use of land and natural resources'. In reality you are taking land out of productive agricultural use. In our cities on the other hand there are large areas of wasteland which could be used for Affordable housing without damaging amenities. In fact improving the neighbouhoods. One hour's drive round Birmingham just outside the Ring threw up the attached 13 sites. These are where the affordable housing should be.

No

Representation ID: 92730

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Adrian Hopkinson

Objective 2: Delivering homes that meet the needs of all our communities. Please note that the peole who come and live in your new homes, say B1 or SG07 will not be Warwickshire people. They will be people who come from Birmingham. As you can see from the attached photos there is lots of room for development in Birmingham, where they would have much better job opportunites and better transport infrastructure. Stuck our in Warwickshire: will they really be happy?

Other

Representation ID: 92742

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Raymond Joyce

Strategic Objective 1: Well designed and beautiful should promote wellbeing. Omitted from the list of examples that make up is access to open countryside which is a feature of South Warwickshire's current appeal.. The priority for homes should be sustainable AND affordable and a recognition that an increase in housing density will be inevitable. The stimulation of investment for higher paid employment will be an essential element in achieving the balance of outstanding design, beauty, sustainability and easy access to the countryside.

Yes

Representation ID: 92789

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

Yes I broadly support these.