No

Representation ID: 86068

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86122

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Thomas Hoare

Absolutely, local people need homes , affordable homes , whether they are built by housing associations or indeed council owned , I also feel council houses should not be sold off cheaply ,

No

Representation ID: 86141

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Clive Corrie

The Gypsy Traveller community appear to be able to construct ample sites for their own use (text redacted) This need to be addressed as a priority and the genuine needs assessed.

No

Representation ID: 86651

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

No group of people should be singled out for preferential treatment. All humans should be treated as equal.

Other

Representation ID: 86748

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Linda Dane

All new housing should be fitted with solar panels where suitable and heat pumps.

No

Representation ID: 86909

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Other

Representation ID: 87015

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

I get the concept of moorings for canal boats. But I am not sure it is clear enough about transit sites for caravans and now those sites will not become permanently occupied sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 87230

Received: 06/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Oliver Jacques

Where there is high demand for new housing, sooner or later there will inevitably be high demand for sheltered accommodation and care homes - in those new communities. Therefore homes planning for new communities should include provision/capacity for care homes and other types of supported housing, to allow for people who grow to be part of their community to not have to face relocating elsewhere when the time comes to require care - with all the distress and uncertainty than can involve.

Yes

Representation ID: 87387

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

No

Representation ID: 88404

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

The policy is incorrect and will lead to deprivation, inequality and unsustainably of the residents who end up living in the wrong development. Bearley Wilmcote site is not a viable option.

Other

Representation ID: 88664

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

I have raised individual comments for each section. I agree broadly on some areas but not on others - see comments

Other

Representation ID: 88688

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Middleton

Affordable & social houses should be built at the same time as the full market value house. Developers leave them to the end and then claim there is no money left for them and get away with it. Their legal pockets are deeper than the councils so they tend to win. Get it right and written in the planning permission.

Yes

Representation ID: 88757

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

No

Representation ID: 88948

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Zoe Adams

The large majority of housing in the area is rentals, the people using them are being charged extortionate amounts, it is not a local community anymore. We do not need more housing, utilise the current housing correctly first

Yes

Representation ID: 89022

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

it is vital that these needs are accommodated in the plans.

Yes

Representation ID: 89066

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Julie Hudson

No further comment except to say that this is a really important chapter. Market failure must be addressed.

Yes

Representation ID: 89239

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

There are many competing demands for housing and land, and this appears to be a good compromise.

Yes

Representation ID: 89395

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

Yes

Representation ID: 89484

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comments

Other

Representation ID: 89582

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Stockley

A home isn't just the house that you live in - it is where your children go to school, where you go when you are sick, where your weekly shop comes from, the local takeaway that you use on a special occasion, the friends you meet in the local park, etc, etc.

Where are the considerations for all the additional infrastructure to support these new homes? Our local schools, hospitals, doctors, dentists, libraries, parks and everything else are already buckling under the strain of the number of people they need to support. Without new infrastructure we cannot have new homes.

Yes

Representation ID: 89753

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

No

Representation ID: 90263

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Edwards

I agree the responsibility lies to our community, and our community alone. Those who choose to not be part of a community should not have any call or claim on its resources.

Other

Representation ID: 91166

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Janet Johnson

You need to make sure that all the new build environment includes solar panels.

No

Representation ID: 91251

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

The Law needs to change about certain communities

No

Representation ID: 91878

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Not on green belt

No

Representation ID: 92629

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

I have concerns about negotiated stopping places being abused by the transient community. How will these be monitored and policed? What if the allocated no of plots is exceeded at any given time - for example, during the Mop Fairs?

Other

Representation ID: 93960

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Chris Murphy

I would like to see more provision of dwellings suitable for those in the population wishing to downsize but wanting to remain in their local community: by this I mean 2 bedroom houses and/or apartments; bungalows; sheltered accommodation and care facilities, including dementia care. This would free up larger homes to accommodate those with young families.

Yes

Representation ID: 94588

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

subject to our comments already made.

No

Representation ID: 94779

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Jackson

N/A

No

Representation ID: 94818

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

There is currently too much uncertainty in Policy, and/or Policy Direction wording in this section to be supportive