Yes

Representation ID: 94845

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Yes

No

Representation ID: 95733

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

The Council must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

Yes

Representation ID: 95918

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes, subject to the comments made for 5.2 and 5.4

Other

Representation ID: 96316

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives generally support this chapter subject to the comments made on individual Polcy Directions.

Yes

Representation ID: 96539

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Subject to previous comments

No

Representation ID: 96639

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Griffin

This council has failed for over ten years to find and address this shortage. Failed attempts show that it is time for fresh thinking and not try to infill sites to plug this gap

Yes

Representation ID: 96673

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Yes subject to earlier comments

Yes

Representation ID: 96855

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) broadly supports this Chapter. Homes should be designed to support an ageing population and first-time buyers to maintain a demographic balance.
New development must include appropriate green infrastructure to enhance the lives of new residents.

No

Representation ID: 97246

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The Council must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

Other

Representation ID: 97318

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lucy White

N/a

Yes

Representation ID: 97737

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

No

Representation ID: 98097

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

The Councils must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

No

Representation ID: 98249

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Woodward

N/a

Yes

Representation ID: 98514

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Philip Sykes

Broadly agree.

No

Representation ID: 98663

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The Council must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

No

Representation ID: 99488

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Extensive growth has already taken place place, object to any more lose of our green spaces.

Yes

Representation ID: 99626

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

broadly agree, subject to comments made on individual policy directions.

No

Representation ID: 99714

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council

There is no difference to providing planning permission for a normal de=welling to providing a pitch. All CiL, S106 and Council taxes should be applied.

Yes

Representation ID: 100263

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Ann Colley

I agree.

Yes

Representation ID: 100306

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

Other

Representation ID: 100942

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

The landowner consortium broadly supports the proposals for the plan to allow for new homes to meet the diverse needs of all residents. However, some concerns are raised within the detailed policy directions relating to this chapter and recommendations provided. In particular, it is evident that further evidence base is required to adequately and effectively respond, including evidence relating to tenure and type of homes, Gypsy and Traveller locational strategy, viability testing relating to M4(2) and M4(3), NDSS needs across the districts and SBCB needs inclusive of a review of the councils’ SBCB registers and secondary data.

No

Representation ID: 101035

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mac Mic Group

Agent: Marrons

The Council must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

No

Representation ID: 101157

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The Council must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

No

Representation ID: 101305

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Chris Clews

How on earth could this succeed and could it be controlled?
Evidence suggest not.

No

Representation ID: 101311

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Loades

I strongly disagree. The development of homes in the South Warwickshire area is completely out of control. The low quality of the homes and estates that are already being developed are in stark contrast to the quality of homes around Stratford-Upon-Avon and Leamington Spa. Equally the stress that will be created by increased traffic leading into these small towns will cause huge congestion which will effect parents delivering children to school and to local businesses. Do not scar this beautiful area will low cost housing, it will ruin the area.

Other

Representation ID: 101312

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

I partially support the proposals in the Delivering Homes chapter but have concerns about affordability, infrastructure, and sustainable development. While the plan recognises the need for diverse housing, it lacks strong guarantees on affordability, particularly in high-cost areas like Warwick and Leamington. Infrastructure commitments must be clearer, ensuring schools, healthcare, and transport are in place before development to prevent strain on services. The Green Belt must not be compromised unnecessarily, and brownfield-first development should be prioritised. The policy should ensure affordability, match infrastructure with growth, and guarantee sustainable housing locations that meet real community needs.

Other

Representation ID: 101315

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Chris Clews

It is questionable whether the objective is achievable so the proposals at best well intentioned.

No

Representation ID: 101336

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

The Council must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

No

Representation ID: 101420

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Agent: Marrons

The Council must monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.

No

Representation ID: 101554

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Alderley Holdings Trust

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The Council should monitor and ensure that the appropriate evidence is updated throughout the period of the Plan once adopted, and that policies can rely on this future evidence to quantify the need for different tenures and types of residential accommodation. Explicitly quantifying a level of tenures, mixes and types at the Plan’s adoption risks the Plan becoming quickly outdated, which would result in the Plan not being positively prepared or effective, as is required by Paragraph 36 of the NPPF.