Showing comments and forms 91 to 120 of 225

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96931

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Representation Summary:

Again, not enough detail on how this would be assessed.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97023

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Roger Horsfall

Representation Summary:

A mixture of site relevant densities and tenures is only achievable if due weight is given to the specifics of adopted local and neighbourhood plans and the developer use of amendments and variations in permissions to alter tenures for profit/CIL exemption is prohibited.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97122

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97238

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97322

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lucy White

Representation Summary:

N/a

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97379

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Godwin Developments

Representation Summary:

We acknowledge the policy direction on housing tenure and types needed in both Districts, but note that discussions often focus on affordable housing. While its provision is crucial, we believe you must also consider other tenures and property types based on site context. For instance, at Aylesbury Road in Hockley Heath, the adjacent site has open market dwellings, suggesting a similar approach could be appropriate. Ultimately, we will adhere to the guidance established through the emerging Local Plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97449

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP

Representation Summary:

Affordable housing is essential in my opinion.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97461

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Harris Lamb

Representation Summary:

the housing requirement should be increased in order to ensure affordable housing needs are met.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97566

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

Representation Summary:

I think there is a greater requirement for rented residential property with secure tenancy than is currently realised. I also feel that at present older people wanting to downsize from family homes to smaller, rented accomodation do not have many reasonably priced options available in the area around Stratford.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97679

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Leonard

Representation Summary:

I think that it is essential that homes have enough outdoor space for children and adults to not feel underthreat by too close proximity to neighbours.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97801

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Representation Summary:

What does "have regard to" involve in practice? There is not enough details as to how the evidence will be assessed.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97920

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Samuel Gillick-Daniels

Representation Summary:

This direction is too general. It goes without saying; any policy direction should include regarding latest evidence as a given. The direction should be specific to its policy area. In this case, for example, something relating to how to set affordability criteria.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98087

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98245

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Woodward

Representation Summary:

N/a

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98333

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Catesby Estates

Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

Representation Summary:

We consider providing a separate affordable housing requirement for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts would be appropriate in terms of reflecting local requirements and local viability calculations. However, it is considered that the tenure and type of affordable homes sought should be determined on a site-by-site basis, based on national planning policy and best available information regarding local housing needs, site surroundings and viability considerations. Catesby Estates support a collaborative approach to identifying site-specific affordable housing requirements, including tenure and type of affordable homes to be provided on-site.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98489

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Philip Sykes

Representation Summary:

Agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98600

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bailey

Representation Summary:

More needs to be done to ensure that south Warwickshire remains a viable place to live for the majority of people.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98667

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98994

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

The consultation states, "5.1 Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes - The councils will have regard to the latest evidence in drafting policies relating to housing tenure and type."

This policy needs to be specific to be subject to informed comment.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99256

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

Representation Summary:

The draft policy direction is far too vague and needs significant refinement before meaningful comments can be made.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99289

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Representation Summary:

The housing requirement should be greater than the minimum Standard Method figure to help ensure that affordable housing requirements are met.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99312

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Timothy Phillips

Representation Summary:

I agree with Mickleton Parish Council views entirely and there is lack of transparency regards all of the plans as facts if known are hard to find if at all.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99321

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

The consultation states, "5.1 Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes - The councils will have regard to the latest evidence in drafting policies relating to housing tenure and type."

This policy needs to be specific to be subject to informed comment.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99473

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Representation Summary:

We have already endured growth.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99612

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

Representation Summary:

agree

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99654

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Tenure:
Affordable housing should be a mix of private rented and 60% market value freehold properties. Social rented should be very limited and confined to city areas where public transports is available. In much of South Wariwickshire public transport is in adequate.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99815

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Delve

Representation Summary:

I believe the level of social housing in Stratford is too high and needs to be significantly reduced.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100245

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Ann Colley

Representation Summary:

As long as there is affordable housing and not just large 4-5 bedroom family houses.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100280

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper

Representation Summary:

Universities must be made responsible for student accommodation. Student requirements can be satisfied in high rise developments, they do not need gardens, and are only occupied for part of the year. Planners must prioritise local demand for housing first. The transient influx of students cannot be allowed to influence local housing needs. They should be provided with accommodation close to their place of learning and steps taken to discourage landlords from renting to students. Student areas are generally shabby and accommodation not well maintained by landlords or occupiers.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100290

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Representation Summary:

NA