Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96931
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery
Again, not enough detail on how this would be assessed.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97023
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Roger Horsfall
A mixture of site relevant densities and tenures is only achievable if due weight is given to the specifics of adopted local and neighbourhood plans and the developer use of amendments and variations in permissions to alter tenures for profit/CIL exemption is prohibited.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97122
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97238
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Squab Hall Farm
Agent: Mr Jack Barnes
The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97322
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Lucy White
N/a
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97379
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Godwin Developments
We acknowledge the policy direction on housing tenure and types needed in both Districts, but note that discussions often focus on affordable housing. While its provision is crucial, we believe you must also consider other tenures and property types based on site context. For instance, at Aylesbury Road in Hockley Heath, the adjacent site has open market dwellings, suggesting a similar approach could be appropriate. Ultimately, we will adhere to the guidance established through the emerging Local Plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97449
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP
Affordable housing is essential in my opinion.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97461
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes
Agent: Harris Lamb
the housing requirement should be increased in order to ensure affordable housing needs are met.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97566
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Brenda Stewart
I think there is a greater requirement for rented residential property with secure tenancy than is currently realised. I also feel that at present older people wanting to downsize from family homes to smaller, rented accomodation do not have many reasonably priced options available in the area around Stratford.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97679
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Susan Leonard
I think that it is essential that homes have enough outdoor space for children and adults to not feel underthreat by too close proximity to neighbours.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97801
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery
What does "have regard to" involve in practice? There is not enough details as to how the evidence will be assessed.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97920
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Samuel Gillick-Daniels
This direction is too general. It goes without saying; any policy direction should include regarding latest evidence as a given. The direction should be specific to its policy area. In this case, for example, something relating to how to set affordability criteria.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98087
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: William Davis Limited
Agent: Marrons
The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98245
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Jonathan Woodward
N/a
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98333
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Catesby Estates
Agent: Mr Will Whitelock
We consider providing a separate affordable housing requirement for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts would be appropriate in terms of reflecting local requirements and local viability calculations. However, it is considered that the tenure and type of affordable homes sought should be determined on a site-by-site basis, based on national planning policy and best available information regarding local housing needs, site surroundings and viability considerations. Catesby Estates support a collaborative approach to identifying site-specific affordable housing requirements, including tenure and type of affordable homes to be provided on-site.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98489
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Philip Sykes
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98600
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Christopher Bailey
More needs to be done to ensure that south Warwickshire remains a viable place to live for the majority of people.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98667
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium
Agent: Mr Jack Barnes
The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98994
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The consultation states, "5.1 Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes - The councils will have regard to the latest evidence in drafting policies relating to housing tenure and type."
This policy needs to be specific to be subject to informed comment.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99256
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason
The draft policy direction is far too vague and needs significant refinement before meaningful comments can be made.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99289
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The housing requirement should be greater than the minimum Standard Method figure to help ensure that affordable housing requirements are met.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99312
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Timothy Phillips
I agree with Mickleton Parish Council views entirely and there is lack of transparency regards all of the plans as facts if known are hard to find if at all.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99321
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
The consultation states, "5.1 Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes - The councils will have regard to the latest evidence in drafting policies relating to housing tenure and type."
This policy needs to be specific to be subject to informed comment.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99473
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson
We have already endured growth.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99612
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham
agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99654
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council
Tenure:
Affordable housing should be a mix of private rented and 60% market value freehold properties. Social rented should be very limited and confined to city areas where public transports is available. In much of South Wariwickshire public transport is in adequate.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99815
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Peter Delve
I believe the level of social housing in Stratford is too high and needs to be significantly reduced.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100245
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Miss Ann Colley
As long as there is affordable housing and not just large 4-5 bedroom family houses.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100280
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper
Universities must be made responsible for student accommodation. Student requirements can be satisfied in high rise developments, they do not need gardens, and are only occupied for part of the year. Planners must prioritise local demand for housing first. The transient influx of students cannot be allowed to influence local housing needs. They should be provided with accommodation close to their place of learning and steps taken to discourage landlords from renting to students. Student areas are generally shabby and accommodation not well maintained by landlords or occupiers.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100290
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott
NA