No

Representation ID: 100497

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Burgess

The approach to so called "affordable housing" is little more than smoke and mirrors.

As things stand affordable housing is subsidised by and paid for by increasing the cost of other housing. It is completely unjust that the burden of subsidising the cost of housing for certain sectors of the community should be borne by others seeking to own their own home. It would be far more equitable and would have a far less distorting impact on the housing market if the subsidies for affordable housing were paid for out of general taxation.

Yes

Representation ID: 100507

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr peter spreadbury

Give us affordable, safe, warm homes in a community with facilities, transport links and safe green spaces.

Yes

Representation ID: 100644

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Ray

the current plan does not reflect the policy

Other

Representation ID: 100695

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Catesby Estates

Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

We consider providing a separate affordable housing requirement for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts would be appropriate in terms of reflecting local requirements and local viability calculations. However, it is considered that the tenure and type of affordable homes sought should be determined on a site-by-site basis, based on national planning policy and best available information regarding local housing needs, site surroundings and viability considerations. Catesby Estates support a collaborative approach to identifying site-specific affordable housing requirements, including tenure and type of affordable homes to be provided on-site.

Other

Representation ID: 100699

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Gladman recognise the importance of new development opportunities to provide appropriate mixes of housing types, sizes and tenures to meet the identified housing needs of the area. It is important to note that the housing mix as identified in the Councils latest evidence base only represents a snapshot in time in relation to the current housing needs.
As such, the policy should provide for flexibility going forward so that the Plan is able to respond to changes in circumstances at the time of an application being submitted so that development opportunities can make better use of the land available whilst responding to the housing needs at that time. In this regard, Gladman support the general approach of the policy, particularly sub-criterion 3 which allows flexibility within the mix and variety of dwellings sizes for market dwellings.
It would be more suitable for the councils to identify and allocate specific sites to meet the needs of older people in appropriate locations close to the required services and amenities, alongside addressing the housing needs where they arise6. In addition, there is unlikely to be market demand in many of the villages and smaller, rural settlements to ensure the viable delivery of extra care housing.
Alternatively, or to supplement the aforementioned approach, proposed strategic allocations could be required to deliver specialist older persons accommodation as part of the allocation policy.

No

Representation ID: 100875

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

The housing requirement should be greater than the minimum Standard Method figure to help ensure that affordable housing requirements are met and we reserve the right to comment further.

Other

Representation ID: 100897

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

Detailed commentary will be provided once the detailed wording of the relevant policies has been provided. It is expected that the policy wording introduces sufficient flexibility throughout, with regard to an up-to-date evidence base.

Yes

Representation ID: 100957

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Stacey Wall

It is essential that affordable housing features frontages and gardens that are not only aesthetically pleasing but also practical and easy to maintain. This is particularly important for future residents, many of whom may have disabilities, limited time or resources for upkeep. Frontages should incorporate low-maintenance landscaping, durable materials, and simple designs that ensure long-term sustainability without excessive upkeep costs

Furthermore, gardens should be designed with consideration for the varying needs of residents, such as disabilities - ensuring they are easily accessible, functional, and capable of being maintained with minimal effort

Yes

Representation ID: 101014

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mac Mic Group

Agent: Marrons

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

Other

Representation ID: 101118

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Stevens

It is key that the current trend to provide housing that meets the very minimum standard, (maximising profit) required by central government is stopped. Warwickshire has to adopt the higher standards of homes fit for the future, not just 10 years before significant refit, it is disingenuous to the people buying the homes and is lip-service to the climate change demands we face today. I believe that homes should meet passive-haus standards and developers unwilling to participate should be set aside in favour of those able to.

Yes

Representation ID: 101142

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

Other

Representation ID: 101287

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

I partially agree with Draft Policy Direction 10 but have concerns about affordability, local needs, and infrastructure. The policy must ensure affordable housing is genuinely affordable, particularly in high-cost areas like Warwick and Leamington, with clearer definitions tied to local incomes. A single approach across South Warwickshire may not reflect local variations, and a more tailored strategy is needed to meet specific housing demands. Additionally, new developments must guarantee infrastructure—schools, healthcare, and transport—before expansion to prevent strain on services. The policy should prioritise local affordability, address regional housing differences, and ensure infrastructure is delivered alongside new homes.

Yes

Representation ID: 101314

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

No

Representation ID: 101323

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Chris Clews

Virtually impossible to bring into reality.

No

Representation ID: 101426

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Agent: Marrons

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole.

The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

A degree of flexibility should be afforded to allow for site and development specific needs, especially within strategic scale developments that can contribute to both local and district wide needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 101501

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jo Valentine Barker

Tenure suitable to the community. Affordable rent is most important.

No

Representation ID: 101546

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Yes

Representation ID: 101566

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Alderley Holdings Trust

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.

Yes

Representation ID: 101852

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Clive Henderson

The policy appears to be acceptable

Yes

Representation ID: 101857

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Agree. Although 40% of homes built across Bishop's Tachbrook Parish have been termed 'affordable' that definition is being stretched! It is to be hoped that District Councils will have the desire and finances to build the stock of Council Houses up.

Other

Representation ID: 101919

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Grevayne Properties Limited

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

The consultation states, "5.1 Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes - The councils will have regard to the latest evidence in drafting policies relating to housing tenure and type."

This policy needs to be specific to be subject to informed comment.

Other

Representation ID: 102014

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Barwood Land

Agent: Savills (UK) Ltd

Large scale developments such as that proposed at Land at Welsh Road and Daventry Road presents an opportunity to deliver a wide variety of house types, sizes and tenures in order to respond to local housing needs. We therefore have no objection to the broad policy approach and would indeed anticipate contributing towards its principles and purpose through the proposed development.

Other

Representation ID: 102094

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Donna Green

I agree with the general statement but for example planning policies and planning decisions on applications for two and three bed homes for owner occupiers tend to be bought by investors, thereby distorting the housing market and depriving people the opportunity to become owner occupiers of those homes. The policies must also look at wider trends and ensure planning permissions for two and three bed homes for occupiers have conditions attached to them stopping them becoming rental properties.

No

Representation ID: 102124

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited

Agent: Turley

IM Land agrees that it is important that policies are based on the latest evidence of housing need such as the HEDNA. However, the policy should also have regard to “current and future demographic profiles” and “other up-to-date evidence of need.”

Other

Representation ID: 102128

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Alton

There are numerous aspects of the policy which make sense. However residents do not trust the Council to apply these in practice. This is exemplified by the type and range of housing that has been approved. The bulk of this has been higher value "executive" properties which are aimed at buyers outside the area rather than the needs of local residents. There has been a lamentable lack of affordable housing. This is another example where the Council has been driven by CILS payments and by being too close to the housebuilders - and their wish to sell expensive homes.

Other

Representation ID: 102138

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: BDW Trading Limited

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

Detailed commentary will be provided once the detailed wording of the relevant policies has been provided. It is expected that the policy wording introduces sufficient flexibility throughout, with regard to an up-to-date evidence base.

No

Representation ID: 102176

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Oram

I think far more focus needs to be put on apartments and flats

Other

Representation ID: 102256

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Agent: Turley

Taylor Wimpey agree that the policy should reflect the most up to date evidence.

However, the policy should be flexible and able to respond to changes to evidence at any point after the policy is adopted.

No

Representation ID: 102289

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Deeley Homes Ltd

Agent: RCA Regeneration

Policies to support specialist housing including housing for older people is supported. We do not however consider that this is always best integrated into larger scale development allocations, as this is dependent upon the local context and the precise type of housing proposed. We consider that policies should be worded to encourage provision of specialist housing without fettering how they should be delivered.

Yes

Representation ID: 102323

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

The South Warwickshire Councils are justified in their approach to housing mix and tenure as it reflects the ambitions of Paragraph 63 of the NPPF, and the NPPF as a whole. The Councils should ensure they provide flexibility within their housing mix and tenure policies to account for circumstances where delivering a housing mix in-line with the identified mix is not feasible or logical.