Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102015
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Barwood Land
Agent: Savills (UK) Ltd
The Government response to the consultation on housing accessibility standards in 2022 concluded that Building Regulations ought to be changed to require that all new homes are M4(2) compliant, but this change has not been implemented. Current Paragraph reference ID: 63-009-20190626 of the PPG states that the accessibility standard must be based upon evidence of need, viability and a consideration of site specific factors, and should not be applied to all development proposals as currently proposed in Draft Policy A. Current policy guidance must be followed, and as the Government's intended implementation mechanism for changes to accessibility standards is the Building Regulations any change in the government position would automatically come into force as compliance with Building Regulations is mandatory.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102127
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
59. Policy regarding the size of homes should be consistent with national policy. Such policy should be flexible and able to respond to changes to evidence at any point in time after the policy is adopted.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102141
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: BDW Trading Limited
Agent: Knight Frank LLP
The draft policy should not pre-determine required levels of NDSS, M4(2) and M4(3) prior to additional work having been undertaken. Once additional evidence base is finalised, including viability testing, the appropriate public consultation should be undertaken to ensure all views are considered. Additional evidence is also required to identify the local needs for NDSS.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102183
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr David Oram
Nothing to add
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102259
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Agent: Turley
Taylor Wimpey agree that the policy should reflect the most up to date evidence.
However, the policy should be flexible and able to respond to changes to evidence at any point after the policy is adopted.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102327
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough
Agent: Marrons
The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102448
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Hill Residential
Agent: Turley
Any policy regarding the size of homes should be consistent with national policy.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102612
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Penelope Beswick
Space standards are very important in protecting the well-being of the occupants whether in owner occupied dwellings or affordable/rented housing.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102966
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Stephen Currie
see comments above.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102998
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Ms Charlotte Scott
Agreed
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103011
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bloor Homes
Agent: Marrons
The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103232
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
The appropriate housing size mix based on need should be the focus. Not out of date statistics
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103284
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon
Agent: Turley
Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.
Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103287
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.
Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103292
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton
Agent: Turley
Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.
Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103294
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.
Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103296
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.
Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103297
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Agent: Turley
Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.
Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103300
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Agent: Turley
Any future policy wording should reflect and meet the standards set out in national policy and guidance, including Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) and Building Regulations. The policy should be flexible to adapt to future updates to national policy and guidance.
Richborough consider that the SWLP should not go beyond the national standards as this could place onerous requirements on developments which could lead to delays in the delivery of much needed new homes.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103401
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Ms Deborah Baker
Houses MUST be built that have minimum sizes ( the UK dwelling sizes are already the smallest in the EU They MUST be built to reflect local existing housing types of building ie sympathetic or the sites will NOT be beautiful AND be energy efficient with landscaping to stop developments becoming bleak ghettos
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103589
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Christine Easton
A good idea. We should accommodate the lesser abled and the elderly. It's cheaper to have a purpose build rather than adapting an existing one.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103803
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Ms Geraldine Ward
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103925
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Stephen Norrie
I support the proposals for a minimum size of home set out here.
However, I will comment that there should also be a maximum size of home, for many reasons: sustainability, energy use, use of space, density, construction emissions, and also for reasons of social equality.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 104006
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Neal Appleton
Agree that new residential development should be built to NDSS.
No exception to the two occupier rule for one and two bed properties.
Agree with accessible living standards, but the proportion of homes for wheelchair users should be evidence-based and the difference between market and affordable housing explained.
New development should not be exempt.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 104266
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Craig Stone
in principal the words suggest the right thing but reality is very different, with local developments continuing to burden existing weak services and infrastructure, greater dependency on cars but inadequate parking, i could go on but filling in this vast document is getting wearisome
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 104373
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Dale Fitzsimmons
The area of Kenilworth is already over run with multiple new housing developments in recent years. The current schools, dentists, GP, nurseries, parks, car parks etc are over run as they are. Bringing more to the town will make this beyond breaking point. Flooding the area with more new build houses will flood Kenilworth with cheap housing and de value the area. Kenilworth is a well regarded town, and the current new developments need to settle before bringing any more at all.
More housing developments will be extremely negative to the town and MUST NOT happen.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 104383
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
We support the proposal to increase the supply of houses meeting accessible living standards that are sized for additional equipment. This should facilitate discharge from hospital into suitable accommodation for those with impaired access and reduced mobility, so would support patient flow and efficiency improvements for acute health services.
We would seek assurance that local demographic needs will be considered and factored into the types and designs of all developments proposed e.g. aging population and resident students.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 104705
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Ian Dunning
All homes should be comfortable, accessible and large enough for anyone to be proud to live there.
Build density and everyone can have the space they need.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 104708
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs L Beeson
Practical and viable points made.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 104904
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Kenneth Chitty
It is essential that policy clearly states the MINIMUM size and number of rooms. Much new building is the UK has been condemned as inadequate with developers stating "We build properties people can afford to purchase" clearly with no consideration of the minimum space required to actually live. Clearly one cannot rely on developers to "Do the right thing".