No

Representation ID: 98246

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Woodward

N/a

No

Representation ID: 98335

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Catesby Estates

Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

The HEDNA is out of date and therefore a refreshed study should be produced to determine whether there is a need for a 100% NDSS provision, in addition to a need for M4(2) and M4(3) compliant properties.

Yes

Representation ID: 98470

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: E Booth

There needs to be many more bungalows and wheelchair accessible properties. Bungalows are at a premium in the local area - going for more than bigger houses in many areas!

No

Representation ID: 98490

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr THOMAS RASTALL

There is no mention of in addition to the 'right size homes' for the right size of roads and parking availability next to these new dwellings - parking in new build estates around Warwick and Leamington is not adequate enough, with cars strewn over the pavements due to inadequate planning of the number of vehicles

Yes

Representation ID: 98494

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Philip Sykes

Agree

No

Representation ID: 98666

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.

Yes

Representation ID: 98939

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

I agree with this approach

No

Representation ID: 99263

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

There should be no exceptions allowed on financial / practical grounds.

No

Representation ID: 99294

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

We have concerns relating to the evidence base used to justify the NDDS requirements of Draft Policy A. Viability testing work needs to be completed.

No

Representation ID: 99474

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Object to further growth and loss of green spaces.

Yes

Representation ID: 99613

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

Yes

Representation ID: 100248

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Ann Colley

Agreed, new housing must be inclusive.

Yes

Representation ID: 100292

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

Yes

Representation ID: 100509

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr peter spreadbury

I broadly agree.

No

Representation ID: 100700

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Catesby Estates

Agent: Mr Will Whitelock

The HEDNA is out of date and therefore a refreshed study should be produced to determine whether there is a need for a 100% NDSS provision, in addition to a need for M4(2) and M4(3) compliant properties.

No

Representation ID: 100880

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

We have concerns relating to the evidence base used to justify the NDDS requirements of Draft Policy A and further viability work needs to be completed.

No

Representation ID: 100909

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

The draft policy should not pre-determine required levels of NDSS, M4(2) and M4(3) prior to additional work having been undertaken. Once additional evidence base is finalised, including viability testing, the appropriate public consultation should be undertaken to ensure all views are considered. Additional evidence is also required to identify the local needs for NDSS.

No

Representation ID: 101018

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Marrons

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.

No

Representation ID: 101146

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. South Warwickshire is a significant area with a housing mix requirement that is under regular fluidity, and any policy should reflect this. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.

Yes

Representation ID: 101299

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

I broadly agree with Draft Policy A but believe stronger guarantees on affordability and accessibility are needed. Ensuring Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) is important to prevent overcrowding and substandard living conditions, particularly in affordable housing. The policy’s focus on accessible housing (M4(2) and M4(3) standards) is positive, but it must ensure delivery aligns with actual demand, especially for older and disabled residents. Additionally, viability concerns must not weaken space or accessibility requirements, as quality housing is essential for long-term sustainability. The policy should guarantee well-designed, spacious, and accessible homes without compromising affordability or local housing supply.

No

Representation ID: 101320

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Chris Clews

The market will decide what is built.
How could/would authorities mandate this?

No

Representation ID: 101322

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.

No

Representation ID: 101423

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Agent: Marrons

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.

Other

Representation ID: 101425

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: caroline owen

While there is general support for new homes to be designed and constructed to M4(2) standard, it is considered that justification should be provided for the draft requirement for 10% of market dwellings and 25% of affordable dwellings to be designed to be ‘wheelchair user friendly’. It is considered that the market is best placed to assess M4(3) requirements for private dwellings. In addition, it is questioned what engagement with and support from Registered Affordable Housing Providers, or need justification has been obtained to support the draft requirement for affordable M4(3) homes.

Yes

Representation ID: 101520

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jo Valentine Barker

Space standards should accommodate the ability for a family to sit down together for a meal at a table. The sitting room should not be considered a bedroom.

No

Representation ID: 101553

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Other

Representation ID: 101691

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Janet Neale

There are requirements that bedrooms in affordable housing can take 2 people, why is this not required across all housing.

Yes

Representation ID: 101859

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Clive Henderson

It appears reasonable to me

Yes

Representation ID: 101866

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 101964

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Anne Page

N/A