Other

Representation ID: 89319

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: L B

As well as inside space for new buildings the outside space should be specified to ensure residents have a good area for recreation.

Yes

Representation ID: 89391

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Amanda Knight

No additional comments

Yes

Representation ID: 89663

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

none

No

Representation ID: 89961

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Matthew Burns

Far too many homes are being built to accommodate the wheelchair bound. Only 1 in 70 uses a wheelchair, this fact should be reflected in the number houses being built to this standard. This will provide significant cost saving basis

Yes

Representation ID: 90062

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

The need to do away with `box room` satisfactorily accommodating two occupiers in each room is welcomed
• Draft Policy A (right size) – agree
• Draft Policy B (custom/self build) -agree

Yes

Representation ID: 90232

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Stuart Keighley

I agree wit the need to provide adequate living space in all new low cost homes and this must include storage space for clothes, belongings, pushchairs and other equipment needed by young families. The Government Standards are on the low side in my opinion.

Yes

Representation ID: 90653

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Warwick Town Council

Why are only one and 2 bed affordable homes required to meet minimum space standards (NDSS) and not all of them? Under 16s are still expected to share in 3 and 4 bed properties.

No

Representation ID: 90837

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

I believe all new developments should be built to be accessible and adaptable unless it can be robustly demonstrated by the applicant that it is not practicable or where the requirements are clearly incompatible with conserving any historic character

Other

Representation ID: 91137

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

National space standards should be applied.

No

Representation ID: 91154

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

agree that more accommodation should be able to accommodate disabled occupants, but the ratio is too high

Yes

Representation ID: 91246

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

No

Representation ID: 91432

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Principles are right but the technical standard used for dwellings to comply with is an appalling piece of work that the government should be ashamed of. It encourages shoe box style homes. We need quality housing / apartments that are of a livable standard and most importantly right size. Those minimum sizes described should be doubled at the very least. This is a very embarrassing piece of work and the County Councils should demand it to be re-written. Fundamentally letting the public down and allowing developers to build small crammed spaces which over long term is not good for health.

Yes

Representation ID: 91619

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

Any housing needs survey should inform this decision when a planning application comes forward. All residential buildings should be lifelong enabled. The statement that 1- and 2-bedroom homes must be built with bedrooms capable of satisfactorily accommodating 2 occupiers in each bedroom should be supported.

No

Representation ID: 91665

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Wright

From what i can read , there is no plan.
This is just a lot of words that does'nt tell us much.

Yes

Representation ID: 91702

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

N/A

No

Representation ID: 91748

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

No

Representation ID: 92030

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Valerie Whittaker

With regard to B1 the proposed development at Hatton, whilst a mixture of housing is laudable, the area is expensive and even starter homes will be beyond a lot of people's reach. In addition the area's amenities are inadequate. Warwick hospital is already struggling to cope with the number of patients accessing the hospital and there are insufficient G.P. surgeries to meet the huge increase of patients resulting from this proposed new settlement. This also applies to schools, shops and community assets in the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 92275

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Kevin Middleton

Provide robust and sustainable infrastructure to include flood prevention, sewage control, road congestion, doctor surgery, schooling

Other

Representation ID: 92532

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Fairburn

I disagree with the exemption "Only in circumstances where it can be robustly demonstrated by the applicant that it is not practicable and financially viable to deliver the provisions". If it was clear to developers that rules can't be waived, they wouldn't pay as much for the land. That would keep prices down and deliver the space requirements.
I also believe that space should be provided in all homes for a hot water tank. Heat Pumps require this one. Even if the developer is allowed to install gas boilers, the homeowner should have the option of a heat pump.

Yes

Representation ID: 92579

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

n/a

No

Representation ID: 92581

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not agree with development of any size home on green belt

No

Representation ID: 92583

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: The Planning Bureau Ltd

It is common for Local Authorities to conflate the needs of ‘wheelchair users’ with the needs of older people in the community. A supportive local planning policy framework will be crucial in increasing the delivery of specialist older persons’ housing and it should be acknowledged that although adaptable and accessible housing can assist it does not remove the need for specific older person’s housing. M4(3) places additional cost on retirement housing over general market housing.

Other

Representation ID: 92893

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Meon Vale Residents Association

Welcome the approach to setting out minimum space standards and accessible living standards to help to ensure that 1 and 2 bedroom homes are built with bedrooms of an adequate size.
There is no policy approach to providing homes to meet the needs of older people who wish to downsize from larger homes. This is a particular concern in rural areas and will become increasingly important with an ageing population. Encourage bungalows and accessible flats. Local Plans elsewhere have included a policy to seek a minimum of 5% of housing on sites of 50 or more homes as bungalows.

Yes

Representation ID: 92895

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Intelligent use of space is needed for peoples mental wellbeing

Yes

Representation ID: 93574

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

Absolutely agree that all types of housing of all size for families and individuals be built.

No

Representation ID: 93923

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor

There should be 80% 1 and 2 bedroom homes this would help keep the young in the area and stop families moving from the south of England where they get a much bigger house but for lesson money such as hertfordshire

Other

Representation ID: 93927

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

The majority of new homes are 2/3/4 bed - majority of units seem to be 4 bed with none adapted for disabled and sparse bungalows. Smaller single person - non retirement homes need including

Other

Representation ID: 94331

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: phillip claydon

Home sizes must match local needs. House builders prefer building 4/5 bed homes regardless of need. Homes built MUST reflect local demographics and requirements.

Yes

Representation ID: 94332

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Waters

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 94584

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

n/a