Other

Representation ID: 91140

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

‘The criteria specified for Green Belt and Cotswold National Landscape areas should apply to proposals outside defined settlement boundaries throughout the area.’

Yes

Representation ID: 91156

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

.

Yes

Representation ID: 91247

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

No

Representation ID: 91343

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Daniel Millwood

Destroying natural habitat and green belt
Loss of countryside and building on flood land
Infrastructure poor already, traffic issues, poor state of roads
No doctors or dentists already, hospitals overwhelmed
Strain on public services

Yes

Representation ID: 91434

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 91620

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

We support this set of principles. It is important to have a set of criteria to be adhered to.

Other

Representation ID: 91707

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

I agree with this in principle. There must also be detail on type of housing built, energy requirements, time scales and ecological considerations etc. Who will monitor it?

No

Representation ID: 91749

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 92236

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Sara Burney

Modern shoebox houses do not have a place in a naturally beautiful place such as Warwickshire, particularly in an area with such cultural significance and heritage. I support smaller developments and self-build options. However, I do believe that mobile homes and modular homes should be accommodated within the definition.

Yes

Representation ID: 92369

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

Self-build policy should not be a way to get around usual planning and housing allocation decisions. It also clearly needs to meet a local need and not those of other parts of the country.

No

Representation ID: 92584

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Do not agree with any development on green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 92595

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 92896

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Meon Vale Residents Association

We welcome the provision in the policy for large sites to include 5% of the developable area to be made available for self build and custom build housing, subject to a Design Code.

Yes

Representation ID: 92900

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

This seems a sensible policy

Yes

Representation ID: 93342

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

The design code for custom/self-build should encourage individual houses that add character to an area.

Yes

Representation ID: 93377

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Haggarty

This is a policy that has been used in other local authorities which has led to a successful mix of housing

Yes

Representation ID: 93797

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Green Party

Yes, however, time scale must be much quicker. Currently in Kenilworth development has been taking place for some 2 years and there are as yet no serviced plots available, we are told until circa 2027. There should be an ongoing supply available each year. There needs to be a strong marketing process to assess demand. The purpose of these Custom and Self Building Housing Plots is for bespoke, innovative homes. Therefore, the design code must rule out the ‘anywhere’ house types that are widely available, and gas should not be provided to encourage low carbon designs.

Yes

Representation ID: 94310

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms M Walker

-

Other

Representation ID: 94333

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: phillip claydon

Though welcome, historically demand for such plots is low. Currently this policy used by developers to get around existing local plan housing requirements.

Yes

Representation ID: 94585

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

n/a

No

Representation ID: 94808

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no.
1 permits development outside a settlement boundary
2 enables unscrupulous developers to sell-on a site for market housing after 12 months by demonstrating no demand for self build.
Suggest that a developer should prove there is the demand and commitment for a specific site/location prior to putting in a planning application and that any consent falls away after 12 months if no building work has commenced in that time
3 carries no mechanism for proof that the self build will be occupied by the “self builder” or stipulate a minimum period of time that it must be so occupied

No

Representation ID: 95295

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

No evidence to warrant 5% self build plots on large allocated sites. self builders would be looking for a unique site rather than an undeveloped plot on a housing estate.

Yes

Representation ID: 95538

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dave Maxted

If I was younger, I would have loved this opportunity to create my own individual home.

No

Representation ID: 95590

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jon Redhead

This encourages poor neighbourhood integration, and is greed inducing for those that have no regard for anything except monetary gain.

No

Representation ID: 95696

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: David Wilson Homes

Agent: Harris Lamb

we do not consider that there is robust evidence to justify the need for 5% self build plots on large new settlement allocations.

No

Representation ID: 95728

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

The best way to deliver self and custom build homes to meet identified needs is to allocate specific sites designed to cater for such homes. Sites will be smaller by their nature, and therefore more responsive to market demand and more likely to be attractive to those wishing to develop their own homes. Larger sites can only efficiently be developed by the major housebuilders, and the inclusion of self and custom build within their developments can create health and safety and operational difficulties when homes in areas are being built by multiple developers to different timescales and standards.

Yes

Representation ID: 95915

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96314

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this draft Policy.

Yes

Representation ID: 96527

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

The Preferred Options may be difficult to enforce with developers.

Yes

Representation ID: 96668

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Agreed