Other

Representation ID: 86077

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

I support the idea in principle, but it is crucial for Henley-in-Arden to retain its commercial spaces on the High Street to ensure the area remains viable and continues to serve the local community effectively, encompassing shops, social venues, and restaurants.

Yes

Representation ID: 86340

Received: 21/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Noel Davis

All community facilities should be protected from speculative development

Yes

Representation ID: 86666

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

The closure of local facilities and businesses is a key part of the degradation of towns and villages as vibrant and sustainable communities.

Yes

Representation ID: 86753

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Linda Dane

I agree but would like to see this policy strengthened to state that there will be a presumption against granting permission for the redevelopment of amenities such as public houses, allotments etc for housing or other uses not for community benefit.

Other

Representation ID: 86843

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Fossett

It sounds sensible yet if too rigorously enforced it would inhibit farm diversification which is often what allows farmers to keep farming.

No

Representation ID: 86917

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Yes

Representation ID: 87021

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 87071

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Dawn Thomas

We need old suitable buildings in Kenilworth to provide Adult Education, a bigger clinic, another doctors surgery. THE OLD KENILWORTH SCHOOL BUILDINGS WOULD BE IDEAL, WITH AMPLE PARKING AND SPACE TO DEVELOP FURTHER PARKING AND FURTHER BUILDINGS, WHICH WOULD SAVE MONEY AND BE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY FACILITIES TO LOCAL PEOPLE, WHICH WE ARE DESPERATE FOR. We also need a permanent banking hub.

Yes

Representation ID: 87324

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Matthew Wright

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 87372

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Bryony Dinnie

It is vital to support community facilities and town and parish councils should be given the necessary support to enable them to do so. This is even more important to alleviate loneliness if people move into rural areas for housing

Yes

Representation ID: 87397

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87578

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88484

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

The emphasis on consultation with the Parish Council concerning facilities in rural areas is vital to ensure the views of the local community are taken into full consideration.

Yes

Representation ID: 88692

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88824

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

I hope this is strong enough in practice

Yes

Representation ID: 89039

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89254

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

Its might also be worth including a clause that says unauthorised demolition or allowed decay of such community facilities will result in the council taking action against the owners. We don't want to see more stories about pubs being knocked down or left to rot in order to let developers try to force through change of use planning applications. We've seen this in Stratford with the several demolitions causing long term eyesores (the club on the corner of Arden St and Greenhill St, and the cinema on Windsor St).

Yes

Representation ID: 89410

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Amanda Knight

Nil

Yes

Representation ID: 89593

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: L B

Community consultation must be included.

Yes

Representation ID: 90665

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Littlewood

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 91168

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91266

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 91758

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 92443

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree - point 3 in draft is important as is a "wholistic" review of a community and the facilities they have in relation to the population and age demographic

No

Representation ID: 92604

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Not on green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 92950

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Absolutely

Yes

Representation ID: 93348

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

I agree with the draft policy.

Yes

Representation ID: 93954

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Priority always to keeping the asset whether green space or building

No

Representation ID: 94081

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mace

In rural areas, there are limited bus services. Where those are provided, the timetables make for them being irregular and only short visits are possible. The provision of services is by commercial operators who may choose to remove them at a moment's notice. As a result the loss of a community facility and removal of bus services soon afterwards will only serve to the isolation of vulnerable persons and / or increase use of private cars.

Yes

Representation ID: 94335

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: phillip claydon

Protection necessary. If lost, integrity and cohesion of rural communities will be severely damaged, threatening long term viability of communities.