Yes

Representation ID: 86096

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86469

Received: 26/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

Makes sense.

Yes

Representation ID: 86676

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

No new development should be allowed which does not meet the embodied carbon requirements. Otherwise we are allowing unsustainable development, and the developer will always try to get away with whatever they can.

No

Representation ID: 86926

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Yes

Representation ID: 87074

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

This could go further by asking our major academic institutions in the region - Warwick uni and Coventry uni - to have an active role in the training of planning, design, build organisations - especially those that are small - in good practice in this area.

Yes

Representation ID: 87406

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

No

Representation ID: 87586

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I do not agree

Other

Representation ID: 88714

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

I agree in principle but the end of life / recycling is a word widely used but in reality UK are poor at achieving efficiently and effectively with many materials that succumb to end of life.

The initial design development and build using such policies can be achieved. I question the viability of the end of life and how it is measured and not manipulated to suit.

Other

Representation ID: 88798

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Erin Williams

Building 54,700 new homes will have massive implications in terms of embodied carbon. Building regulations say almost nothing about embodied carbon, so it is good to see that the intention is to go beyond building regulations for this. RIBA 2030 targets rather than 2025 must be used, and there need to be actual requirements in this local plan to reduce embodied carbon in construction.

Yes

Representation ID: 89061

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89267

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

I've recently seen the presentation of a fairly large industrial building in Leicestershire that already meetings the embodied carbon <750kgCO2e standard, so this is what new builds can already be made to. With that in mind these conditions appear adequate to enforce that minimum level of carbon use in construction.

Yes

Representation ID: 89476

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comment

Other

Representation ID: 89564

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

RIBA 2030 targets rather than 2025 must be used, and there need to be actual requirements in this local plan to reduce embodied carbon in construction.

Yes

Representation ID: 90420

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Chris Tagg

Agree

Other

Representation ID: 91180

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91674

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 91770

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

Particlaurly for dvelopments - are you going to include self-build in this requirement? If so this will put people off if you don't provide sme directive/guidance of minimum standards and how they can be met

Yes

Representation ID: 92467

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

No

Representation ID: 92593

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: The Planning Bureau Ltd

All proposals within the policy should be stepped in line with Government targets and Building Regulations.

Other

Representation ID: 92626

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

No comment

Yes

Representation ID: 92971

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Let's hope this is possible

Yes

Representation ID: 93140

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Penny Gray

Fully agree.

Yes

Representation ID: 93188

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Checkley

I fully support Draft Policy Direction- 24

Yes

Representation ID: 93465

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 93581

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Robin Rumbles

Nothing to add

Yes

Representation ID: 93671

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, but I encourage adopting the RIBA 2030 level rather than RIBA 2025. Failing immediate adoption, RIBA 2030 could be included as 'mandatory by 2030', given the plan lifetime extends well past then.

Other

Representation ID: 93825

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Green Party

Building 54,700 new homes will have massive implications in terms of embodied carbon. Building regulations say almost nothing about embodied carbon, so it is good to see that the intention is to go beyond building regulations for this. RIBA 2030 targets rather than 2025 must be used, and there need to be actual requirements in this local plan to reduce embodied carbon in construction.

Yes

Representation ID: 94396

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Waters

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 94631

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd

Agent: Turley

Rainier support the approach, providing it is supported by evidence around its viability.

Yes

Representation ID: 94988

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Should “major development” in first sentence be more specifically defined?
It the development cannot meet the targets what are the consequences which flow? Last sentence