No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 95737
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Bloor Homes Western
Agent: Marrons
The importance of lowering embodied carbon in building materials is understood, and this being encouraged by policy is noted. The quantitative targets within Policy Direction 24 refer however to the Low Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) and the Royal British Institute of Architects (RIBA) rather than specific analysis for the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 95940
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96003
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall
I agree.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96335
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Southam Town Council
Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96556
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96799
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: John Dinnie
Yes, the principles are to be applauded. The temptation to introduce unnecessary bureaucracy should be resisted.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96976
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Alcester Town Council
This is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97171
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council
This policy will increase the cost of building by an unacceptable level.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97250
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Squab Hall Farm
Agent: Mr Jack Barnes
The importance of lowering embodied carbon in building materials is understood, and this being encouraged by policy is noted. The quantitative targets within Policy Direction 24 refer however to the Low Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) and the Royal British Institute of Architects (RIBA) rather than specific analysis for the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97505
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP
This is an excellent approach.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97811
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Brenda Stewart
A very good approach
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97954
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Simon Fox
Targets are not stringent enough for a Net Zero future.
They only take effect once a site is selected - but the best design is to avoid emissions by selecting sites that need the least building materials - so solid ground, not subject to flooding, or not clay soils that require deeper foundations and therefore higher embedded carbon.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98102
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: William Davis Limited
Agent: Marrons
The importance of lowering embodied carbon in building materials is understood, and this being encouraged by policy is noted. The quantitative targets within Policy Direction 24 refer however to the Low Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) and the Royal British Institute of Architects (RIBA) rather than specific analysis for the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98660
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium
Agent: Mr Jack Barnes
The importance of lowering embodied carbon in building materials is understood, and this being encouraged by policy is noted. The quantitative targets within Policy Direction 24 refer however to the Low Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) and the Royal British Institute of Architects (RIBA) rather than specific analysis for the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99596
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Anthony Cocker
I strongly agree with this approach. If it is to be implemented rigorously, it will require substantial changes to Council processes, including training of Officers and Councillors, changes to design guides and SPD, and particularly recommended materials
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99641
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham
agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100113
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Good policy.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100353
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott
NA
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100363
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons
I agree with the approach laid out
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100522
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper
Where's the money coming from?
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100956
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium
Agent: Knight Frank LLP
The policy focuses on reducing embodied carbon in new developments by encouraging the reuse of existing building materials and adopting circular economy principles. This approach aligns with the NPPF, in relation to mitigating climate change through sustainable construction practices.
However, it should be noted that the proposed 'Part Z' amendment, advocating for the inclusion of embodied carbon considerations in Building Regulations, whilst not yet enacted into law, may provide alternative measures. Therefore, the SWLP's policy on embodied carbon should be worded in a way to ensure consistency with emerging Building Regulations amendments to avoid unnecessarily exceeding these.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101090
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mac Mic Group
Agent: Marrons
Targets named are not informed by specific analysis of the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability. Ultimately, the policy in the Local Plan should be in accordance with the requirements of national policy, Building Regulations, changes expected by the forthcoming Future Homes Standard.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101170
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited
Agent: Mr Jack Barnes
The importance of lowering embodied carbon in building materials is understood, and this being encouraged by policy is noted. The quantitative targets within Policy Direction 24 refer however to the Low Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) and the Royal British Institute of Architects (RIBA) rather than specific analysis for the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101377
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Hallam Land
Agent: Marrons
The importance of lowering embodied carbon in building materials is understood, and this being encouraged by policy is noted. The quantitative targets within Policy Direction 24 refer however to the Low Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) and the Royal British Institute of Architects (RIBA) rather than specific analysis for the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101415
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land
Agent: Marrons
We would recommend that the approach set out in the Warwick Net Zero DPD and supporting SPD is followed, this requires the consideration and reduction of upfront embodied carbon, without setting a specific target at this stage. The application of specific targets needs to be fully considered as part of the Plan evidence base and viability assessment.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101544
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Alderley Holdings Trust
Agent: Mr Jack Barnes
The importance of lowering embodied carbon in building materials is understood, and this being encouraged by policy is noted. The quantitative targets within Policy Direction 24 refer however to the Low Energy Transformation Initiative (LETI) and the Royal British Institute of Architects (RIBA) rather than specific analysis for the Plan area. A local analysis of the ability of different types and scales of development to meet an embody carbon policy should be prepared and subsequently tested through viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101551
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Ms Zoe Leventhal
Critical for meeting net zero targets and mitigating against effects of climate change
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101668
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason
This development is not good for the area
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101936
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102039
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Barwood Land
Agent: Savills (UK) Ltd
Our clients consider the emerging policy approach to be unsound - it is plainly not consistent with national policy as the requirements of the policy are not expressed as a percentage uplift from the TER as now required by the WMS.
The next logical question that follows is whether, in light of the WMS, there is merit in including a policy in the SWLP or instead relying upon Building Regulations. For the reasons set out above, our clients consider that there are good reasons to delete draft Policy DPD22 rather than modify it. The SWLP can then focus on ensuring development is directed towards sustainable locations (a matter covered in more detail elsewhere in our representations) and leave the Building Regulations regime to control the detailed standards for building fabric and energy generation. Such an approach would be entirely consistent with the Government’s expectation for the plan-making process.