Yes

Representation ID: 86099

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

The existing blue infrastructure in Henley-in-Arden, including waste and fluvial systems, is outdated, in poor condition, and at times of heavy rainfall is unable to cope with the demand.

Other

Representation ID: 86321

Received: 21/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Daniel Chandler

Again, the consideration of existing residents and the impacts of new developments needs to be at the heart of any planning decision. The area adjacent to Site C1 is already stretched and any new developments would severely impact. Approving this site without significant additional assessment and significant levels of utilities investment would be tantamount to gross negligence.

Yes

Representation ID: 86339

Received: 21/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Noel Davis

The ever increasing burden on water supply affects everyone. Adding more demand results in less reliable supply.

No

Representation ID: 86458

Received: 25/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carole Johnson

Water pressure is a problem within this area and just connecting to existing supplies does not alleviate future problems including leaks.

Yes

Representation ID: 86472

Received: 26/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

I agree with all of this.

Yes

Representation ID: 86681

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Water and waste water infrastructure is struggling to cope with climate change and all improvements must be paid for by users. Requiring new developments to be part of the solution, not add to the problem, is a basic requirement.

Other

Representation ID: 86756

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Linda Dane

Too many housing sites now have unsightly Suds which are never maintained afterwards. It would be better if more use were made of soakaways under private gardens.

No

Representation ID: 86929

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Need less people - control immigration properly - and maintain existing network.

Yes

Representation ID: 87077

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

The challenge here is developers that design new builds in isolation to water companies who are incentives to deregulate water and waste water connections. Therefore, the council needs to put more pressure on ofwat and water companies to ensure developers follow good design practices.

Yes

Representation ID: 87409

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87589

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88718

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Other

Representation ID: 88772

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Matthew Dockrell

You need to be very careful about the availability of water supply particularly to the Eastern side of the county as this provides a boundary between two water companies. At this point the water and waste supply is at its thinnest. When you speak with Severn Trent you need to ask question not just about water availability but regional trunk mains which form the artery of the control systems.

Other

Representation ID: 89067

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

It is vital that there is adequate water supply and sewerage provision made BEFORE any proposed development is commenced

Other

Representation ID: 89215

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Durk

Make sure that houses are not downhill from roads, or if they are, insist on some means of catching run-off before it reaches the house or garage

Yes

Representation ID: 89270

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

Separating grey water, black water and rain water is an excellent idea. I would suggest that new developments should include not only SUDS but reasonably sized water collection facilities for grey/rain water that can be reused for things such as watering garden plants or flushing toilets.

Yes

Representation ID: 89479

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comment

No

Representation ID: 89599

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jackie Carr-Smith

Large scale developments will have a profound effect on the existing sewage treatment works. The existing infrastructure can barely cope, with many cited incidences throughout the country, of raw sewage entering our rivers at times of increased rainfall. The impact on our rivers and wildlife of large developments is not addressed as who will pay for it?

Yes

Representation ID: 89667

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

Drainage strategies must be followed through to completion and monitoring of this must be effectively resourced

Other

Representation ID: 90495

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

strategic growth site BW is an excellent example of why assessment of each site is required. The A3400 road and fields already flood regularly, in winter this results in increased RTCs particularly in an already notorious ratrun area around Billesley. There is no opportunity for natural runoff and the investment in infrastructure required to support drainage would make the site unattractive to developers.

No

Representation ID: 90528

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jason Lupton

A local development in Stratford-upon-Avon hasn't been implemented properly and surface water flooding occurs in unsuitable areas.
The cumulative effect of numerous developments has caused flooding to residential areas which date back 100+ years with little flooding impact until now.
All new developments should include swales, SuDS, water recycling within the site before discharging into the wider services.
New technologies exist that include combined utilities and tree pits as part of SuDS solutions - these should be included and the excuse of utilities routes prevent tree planting shouldn't be considered.

Yes

Representation ID: 90672

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Littlewood

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 90881

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

I agree

Other

Representation ID: 91183

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council is not convinced that sufficiently robust criteria are applied
to ensuring that there is adequate wastewater infrastructure to serve new developments
and wishes to see this issue addressed more thoroughly.’

Yes

Representation ID: 91680

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

Representation ID: 91776

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

you state that all development will have "suitably designed SuDS schemes". Who will manage these etc?

Other

Representation ID: 92470

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree but as stated in 7.8, I believe residential or industrial / business sites designated should all have their own water storage reservoirs, solar and energy storage to power and fuel the designated site. Clearly applicable to sites of a certain scale - e.g. 150 houses plus.

Yes

Representation ID: 92599

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Fairburn

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 93001

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Can you hold Severn Trent to account? The water companies are largely owned by foreign investment companies and are only interested in reliable profits

No

Representation ID: 93070

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Matt Sansom

There were more than 5 occasions in the last year where water supply to the Hampton Magna area were severely interrupted due to pipe failures. It is obvious that this system is already antiquated and would not be able to supply a larger area of housing/industry.