Yes

Representation ID: 86106

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

Representation ID: 86307

Received: 20/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Nash

No

Yes

Representation ID: 86690

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Nothing to add.

No

Representation ID: 86936

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Yes

Representation ID: 87085

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

But more emphasis needs to be on asking developers to work with other stakeholders to ensure that they respect the environment and more emphasis needs to be given to green spaces, etc within new builds,

Yes

Representation ID: 87417

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Except as regards the sustainability of our heritage buildings - this policy needs to be more progressive

Yes

Representation ID: 89078

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89496

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comments

Yes

Representation ID: 89758

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 91467

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Michelle Mendoza

In theory, yes of course I would be pro designs which take into account designing sites with greenery and eco policies in mind.

I asked one of your planning representatives at the Southam site what measures would be taken to lessen the burden of the “eyesore” of a major new house building site on a green field area, and he wasn’t able to answer. One would hope that trees and greenery would be integral to any such site amidst and surrounding the buildings. Trees in particular would be of benefit to residents and of course to wild life.

Other

Representation ID: 92635

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Not if green belt erosion is involved

Yes

Representation ID: 93017

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

I don't remember seeing hedgerows mentioned specifically but the loss of these has drastically changed the landscape and led to loss of wildlife. Policies to encourage planting more would be hugely beneficial .

No

Representation ID: 93507

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Sims

Households in SUA have grown from 12K in 2011 to 29k in 2025. In that time, not one new park has been created; green belt land has been built on; and no consideration has been made for the mental wellbeing of small market town residents that live here for a reason. Nothing in this plan suggests any new developments will be any better. This is an exercise in appeasing a new government with zero evidence that the ongoing obliteration of our countryside is required at all.

Yes

Representation ID: 93546

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Penny Gray

I would like to see -- throughout the SWLP - priority given to climate/environmental-related adaptation and mitigation. It is the last item on Strategic Policy direction 25 and so appears somewhat as an afterthought.

Yes

Representation ID: 93707

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, particularly designing to 20-minute neighbourhood principles.

No

Representation ID: 95124

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anna Finerty

no... it will make it less beautiful and it will no longer be a rural area, the infrastructure will not cope

Yes

Representation ID: 95222

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

subject to comments against DPD 25

No

Representation ID: 95240

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

They are entirely aspirational and the reality of mass development and solar panels across the area will ensure the proposals cannot be achieved.

Yes

Representation ID: 95757

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Yes

Representation ID: 95951

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. Note comments at 8.1 and 8.3

Yes

Representation ID: 96346

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives broadly support these proposals.

Yes

Representation ID: 96517

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Note comments on 8.1 and 8.3
In reality the concept of a 20 minute neighbourhood does not lend itself to retro-fitting. As existing settlements are allowed to expand with new building, it is unclear how the 20 minute neighbourhood will be enforced through planning.

Yes

Representation ID: 96715

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Janet Gee

no further comment

No

Representation ID: 96900

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

It is unlikely that the proposal would be implemented without considerable cost and difficulty.

Yes

Representation ID: 97015

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Yes, please note comments above.

Yes

Representation ID: 97045

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) broadly supports the proposals in this Chapter.
The historic character of our communities must be protected.
Public realm improvements should enhance pedestrian areas and support active travel.

Yes

Representation ID: 97268

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Other

Representation ID: 97784

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

In theory, but in practice it is unlikely that they could be implemented without considerable challenge and cost in financial terms and to the heritage and the wellbeing of the residents of Wilmcote.

Yes

Representation ID: 98115

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Yes

Representation ID: 98604

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

yes