Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 61

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98642

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99549

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

Representation Summary:

It is not conceivable that the beautiful countryside of South Warwickshire can be enhanced given the size of the housing target that has to be achieved. At best the impact of development can be minimised by focusing it on brownfield sites and sites not in the Green Belt.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99567

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Representation Summary:

X

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101029

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

Representation Summary:

The landowner consortium generally supports the chapter and has provided comment to the detailed policy directions. However, any design-based requirements should allow sufficient flexibility, whereby overarching design codes should set a flexible framework for site-specific design policies. A careful approach to densities should be undertaken, whereby flexibility is key to ensuring that each site is assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101148

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mac Mic Group

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101197

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101405

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101477

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101528

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Alderley Holdings Trust

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101586

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

Representation Summary:

Yes, I broadly support the proposals in this chapter. The emphasis on high-quality design, sensitivity to local context, and creating sustainable, adaptable, and attractive places aligns with the goal of fostering vibrant communities. However, I would suggest considering the impact of new developments, such as those in SG04, on significant heritage sites like Kenilworth Castle. It’s crucial that development in areas with such historical importance is carefully managed to ensure that both modern needs and cultural heritage are preserved. Additionally, the inclusion of local design codes could further strengthen the alignment between development and the area's character.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101698

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason

Representation Summary:

This development is not good for the area

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101861

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

It will be important to have a strategic design policy that reference clear attractive design codes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102306

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: BDW Trading Limited

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

Representation Summary:

BDW generally supports the chapter and has provided comment to the detailed policy directions. However, any design-based requirements should allow sufficient flexibility, whereby overarching design codes should set a flexible framework for site-specific design policies. A careful approach to densities should be undertaken, whereby flexibility is key to ensuring that each site is assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102359

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102388

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Taylor Wimpey are able to broadly support the direction of travel in relation to the ‘A Well-designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire Chapter’ however, as set out in the responses to each of the specific questions, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103081

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The chapter’s aims to promote high-quality and sustainable design within South Warwickshire are broadly supported. The inclusion of a wide range of design codes is welcomed, but greater clarity is needed in some areas to ensure consistency in determinations.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103318

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Andrew Close

Representation Summary:

Various research on built and natural heritage have shown good design is critical to the acceptance of new development and yields better outcomes for everyone. So to support residents and developers I would suggest you merge most if not all policies in this chapter into ‘one hook’ for future SPD/supplementary plans/design codes. This will ensure the Councils can be future-proofed for the NDMPs that the government will adopt, but also reduces burdens on applicants and allow council officers to protect key characteristics of local areas and not get diverted with checklists. Tackle the unnecessary amount of paperwork and pdfs!

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103561

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103562

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103563

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103564

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103565

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103570

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103572

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104170

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Norrie

Representation Summary:

Yes. No additional points.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104782

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dan Brock

Representation Summary:

I object to the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire section due to concerns about subjective design criteria, potential conflicts with local character, and inadequate community involvement. The emphasis on beauty is subjective and may not reflect diverse community preferences. Additionally, the plan lacks clear guidelines to ensure new developments harmonize with existing local character and heritage. Insufficient community engagement raises concerns about whether local perspectives on design and aesthetics have been adequately considered. Addressing these issues is crucial to ensure that development aligns with community values and preserves the unique character of South Warwickshire.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104788

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Dunning

Representation Summary:

Don't allow any low-density development. Townhouses and apartments only. They can all be beautiful and will make the 15-minute city effortlessly achievable.

Don't prevent solar panels on roofs and better windows in the name of "keeping character"
Your grandchildren won't appreciate the character of your house when the world is on fire from the climate crisis.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104990

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Susan Ingleby

Representation Summary:

Yes

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 106373

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: West Midlands Housing Association Planning Consortium

Agent: Tetlow King Planning

Representation Summary:

The WMHAPC welcomes guidance for new developments with regards to design as it is a useful tool for understanding the expectations of the Council when putting forward planning applications. The WMHAPC asks the Council to be wary of ways in which overly restrictive design codes or demanding policies could impact development viability and therefore restrict the provision of affordable housing in SW.
The WMHAPC would also like to take the opportunity to raise that it is not just appearance but also the maintenance and management of design features and spaces should be considered when designing residential schemes which include an affordable housing element.
Furthermore, the WMHAPC advocates for a well integrated and varied distribution of affordable housing
within housing schemes should allow for social integration within the overall design, although the WMHAPC reminds the Council to consider the practical implications for housing associations when it comes to the management of their housing stock.
.Encouraging pepper potting across a scheme makes
management more difficult as the properties are more spread out. The WMHAPC would not encourage affordable housing to be grouped together in one area, instead recommending that affordable housing is clustered across a site, with policy expressing a maximum group size or range; approximately 10 dwellings forming each cluster on larger sites (circa 100+ dwellings) is often favoured.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 106951

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Coventry and Warwickshire ICB

Representation Summary:

The ICB is supportive of the Local Plan Preferred Options 2025 having a strategic design policy to set out strategic design principles, requiring compliance with the relevant design code(s) where they exist; the ICB asks that associated policies reflect the requirement for key health infrastructure buildings to adhere to specified Health Building Notes and associated national policy and direction from NHS England.