Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 61

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97050

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Representation Summary:

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) broadly supports the proposals in this Chapter.
There should be an emphasis on local healthcare and community services.
Many rural settlements have ageing populations requiring additional healthcare services.
Green spaces should be maintained and expanded to support physical and mental wellbeing.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97271

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97780

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Representation Summary:

Broadly agree but the challenges involved in implementing are considerable.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98120

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98637

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99592

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

Representation Summary:

Given the scale of development it will be impossible to maintain a safe and healthy environment. The increase in traffic will increase pollution. Development will cause noise pollution and will reduce opportunities for walking and other leisure activities in the beautiful South Warwickshire countryside. The increased population will increase demand for health services which are already under pressure. In particular, Warwick Hospital is already at capacity and an increased population will inevitably result in longer wait times for treatment and the death of some patients! Will the significant investment in health care that will be required be forthcoming?

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99657

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

Representation Summary:

yes - agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100240

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Representation Summary:

I broadly agree. I would also like to state that many utilise living in the countryside in South Warwickshire as place for peace and comfort, and as an escape from the higher pace of life in a town/city. People use the countryside for walks in the fresh air to help ease mental health and for fitness. Please also consider this.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100404

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Representation Summary:

na

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101069

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

Representation Summary:

The chapter seeks to deliver a healthy, safe and inclusive South Warwickshire, which is welcomed, and outlines strategies to enhance community well-being through policies addressing pollution control and the implementation of Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) for major developments. These measures aim to mitigate environmental hazards and ensure that new developments contribute positively to public health. The emphasis on comprehensive pollution management and the requirement for HIAs reflect a proactive approach to fostering healthier, safer, and more inclusive communities Comments are provided to the specific policy directions.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101172

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mac Mic Group

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.
Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101203

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101402

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101492

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101522

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Alderley Holdings Trust

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101622

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

Representation Summary:

I broadly support the proposals in the "A Healthy, Safe, and Inclusive South Warwickshire" chapter, particularly the emphasis on mitigating pollution and considering health impacts through assessments. Ensuring developments, such as SG04, align with policies on reducing pollution and promoting healthy lifestyles is crucial for building sustainable communities. I also appreciate the inclusion of Health Impact Assessments for major developments, as they help address the potential impacts on local health. However, more specific consideration of how green spaces and recreational areas are integrated into large developments could further enhance community wellbeing and inclusivity.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101789

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jo Valentine Barker

Representation Summary:

Health & Wellbeing needs to be central to decision making.
Pollution control should not be elided with climate change. This is lazy science. Eg Pm10s are pollutants resulting from combustion but not responsible for climate change per sais.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101860

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102366

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102367

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: BDW Trading Limited

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

Representation Summary:

The chapter seeks to deliver a healthy, safe and inclusive South Warwickshire, which is welcomed, and outlines strategies to enhance community well-being through policies addressing pollution control and the implementation of Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) for major developments. These measures aim to mitigate environmental hazards and ensure that new developments contribute positively to public health. The emphasis on comprehensive pollution management and the requirement for HIAs reflect a proactive approach to fostering healthier, safer, and more inclusive communities. Comments are provided to the specific policy directions.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102419

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark DEWDNEY

Representation Summary:

Section and overall Plan does not address recreation / sport for the disabled. Either on land or water

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103092

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

The formation of the SWLP policies should continue to be based on a collaborative approach to mitigating environmental and health impacts. More clarity is required on what will be detrimental to health and wellbeing.

Introduction of a Screening Report could help in determining what is detrimental, however the blanket policy for all major developments is not justified. Instead, the policy should isolate impacts and only require screening and assessment where a proposal would clearly be detrimental.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104187

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Norrie

Representation Summary:

No additional comments.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104527

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neal Appleton

Representation Summary:

However, policy should consider also the cumulative impact of constant development on the health and well-being of communities.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104784

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dan Brock

Representation Summary:

I object to the A Healthy, Safe, and Inclusive South Warwickshire section due to concerns about the plan's effectiveness in addressing health inequalities and promoting community well-being. The proposed policies lack specificity in mitigating pollution and ensuring that major developments undergo comprehensive health impact assessments. Additionally, there is insufficient emphasis on creating accessible green spaces and promoting active lifestyles, which are crucial for public health. Without clear, actionable strategies, the plan may fail to foster a genuinely healthy, safe, and inclusive environment for all residents.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104787

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Draper

Representation Summary:

The C1 proposed development ( circa 5000 houses ) is in complete contradiction to the A Healthy, Safe, and Inclusive South Warwickshire chapter proposal

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104809

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Dunning

Representation Summary:

You're not doing enough.
Most of the harm talked about here comes from dependency on private motor vehicles.
Stop building developments that create that dependency, and the harm will reduce.

Build density.
Build active travel infrastructure.
Build public transport.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104988

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: H Crook

Representation Summary:

must ensure infrastructure is put in before the any development

so far in stratford area, developers have often avoided responsibilities by legal means, and so have negatively impacted both existing and incoming populations

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 104997

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Susan Ingleby

Representation Summary:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 106952

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Coventry and Warwickshire ICB

Representation Summary:

The ICB is supportive of draft Policy Direction-30- Health Impact Assessment for Major Development. The ICB is mindful that broader issues affecting population health and wellbeing, including air pollution/quality and the availability of green spaces, are priorities. Recognising this, the ICB would strongly endorse the direction, including the use of Health Impact Assessments. The ICB envisages closer proactive working with the District Councils to help inform and develop the future Health Impact Assessment and Supplementary Planning Documents that will be undertaken to ensure health considerations are integrated into the planning process.