Yes

Representation ID: 86032

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beth Bolton

We need a lot more ev chargers than we have now, even without further expansion of housing. It’s the long journey that needs catering for.

Yes

Representation ID: 86111

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

Representation ID: 86169

Received: 13/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Ukleja

EV is not the only solution.

No

Representation ID: 86309

Received: 20/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Nash

EV infra structure is still in very early stages and despite government attempts to stop fuel vechiles, the system is still a long way off working. Adding EV infrastructure is not required

Other

Representation ID: 86331

Received: 21/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Noel Davis

Until we can generate electricity without burning fossil fuels this is pointless.

No

Representation ID: 86416

Received: 24/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daphne Tilley

By the time the New Settlements come online, EVs will be being replaced by Hydrogen powered vehicles

Other

Representation ID: 86623

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Trevor Bradnam

This whole EV direction is not viable. Infrastructure will never suffice and electric vehicles are not a green approach if taken overall.

No

Representation ID: 86695

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Electric vehicles are part of the solution to sustainable transport, but they should not be the primary method of sustainably powering private vehicles.

This focus has come about only through central governments mandating a solution to the pollution of fossil fuelled travel.

Hydrogen is a far more implementable and sustainable way of storing energy.

Put the requirement for zero carbon emissions on vehicle manufacturers and let/ make them produce the best solutions.

No

Representation ID: 86940

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Electric vehicles are a failed concept

Yes

Representation ID: 87091

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

Please consider additional needs like hydrogen fuel cells and battery recycling too

Yes

Representation ID: 87127

Received: 04/02/2025

Respondent: Jonathan Devereux

In particular that planning permission for new housing will require EV charging points. Astonishing that it isn't already a requirement on estate being built now. Danger is Warwickshire will be as far behind as it already is on fibre wifi. Heat pumps too best installed at development not retro fitted.

Yes

Representation ID: 87423

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

No

Representation ID: 88466

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Debbie Taylor

Most families cant afford electric cars and the risk of fired from charging these cars has to be considered.Where do all the batteries go after their short life?????

Other

Representation ID: 88842

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree in principle but the infrastructure should be fast charge points everywhere anything less is unviable.

What is of major concern within this policy is the lack of foresight for enabling infrastructure for driverless cars. Whilst this maybe the future it highlights one massive UK and global standards and directives that should be formed to frame the future landscape of EVs to enable councils to plan appropriate rather than spend their time digging up roads / pavements and permanent chaos and a blight to the local towns / cities and new developments.

Yes

Representation ID: 89085

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89358

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Durk

I agree that more WV charging is needed. Is there scope for spending some of the available money on encouraging solar powered charging at people's homes?

No

Representation ID: 90309

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Edwards

I remain to be convinced by the EV myth. If calculations included the extra wear on roads and tyre degradation due to extra vehicle weight, arguments may become more credible. The full life cycle requires inclusion also of the cost of the new demand on raw materials, their supply chain, as well as infrastructure and environmental costs of electricity before you give yourselves the Blue Peter badge,

Yes

Representation ID: 90423

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Chris Tagg

EVs aren't perfect, and ideally we should all be walking, cycling and using public transport. But until then, EVs are proven to be better than ICE cars.

Other

Representation ID: 90515

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

The use of EVs is not yet mainstream but needs to be planned for. Provision of public charging stations in a rural area may increase traffic there in order to use the facilities, this will cause congestion and noise pollution, urbanisngin what should be a rural location.

Yes

Representation ID: 90929

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 91201

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

‘A much more co-ordinated approach to developing an adequate public charging
infrastructure is required if the uptake of electric vehicles is to match central and local
government aspirations.

Yes

Representation ID: 91202

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

‘A much more co-ordinated approach to developing an adequate affordable public charging infrastructure is required if the uptake of electric vehicles is to match central and local government aspirations.

Yes

Representation ID: 91308

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr A Patrick

Yes but. I know of people with no private parking space who are delaying switching to EV because there is not suitable charging location within range. I also see that WCC is inept/incompetent in providing on-street chargers - eg. binswood Avenue where WCC spend our money to install signs to encourage non-EV vehicles to block the chargers. Unbelievable!

No

Representation ID: 91331

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Transport for West Midlands

Proposed highway improvements focus on increasing capacity to manage congestion and support future growth. While beneficial, increased road capacity can actually lead to higher car usage, which could contradict sustainability goals. A key concern for neighbouring areas is whether traffic impact assessments have been conducted to avoid shifting congestion to external road networks. How will any resultant roadwork disruption be minimised during construction and what agreements will be established for any cross-boundary infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 91540

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Particulraly the 2 nd point: Enabling a geographical and socially inclusive transition to EVs by addressing the social housing charge point infrastructure

Yes

Representation ID: 91572

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Maxine Mayer

The application of this policy should be mandatory for all new development.

Yes

Representation ID: 91700

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

No

Representation ID: 91784

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

this policy does not take into account those that live in more rural areas where there is no SDC owned land e.g. Brailes. How will this be equitable across the District?

Other

Representation ID: 92485

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Fast Charging only. UK PLC should not adopt the slow standard charging. Fast Charging only

No

Representation ID: 92624

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Yates

New and existing housing developments need to have EV chargers for visitors and contractors as charging points at a residential property will be used by home owners