Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 117

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92642

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Representation Summary:

Waste of time more polluting than normal vehicles

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92687

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Fairburn

Representation Summary:

You refer to coming demand. Demand for EVs depends on the availability of charge points. Install chargers before expecting people to buy EVs. Prioritise installing more 7kW chargers over expensive superfast ones.
The draft plan says on-street charging is the responsibility of WCC. Whenever it falls to them, SDC should ensure homeowners can easily install a small channel across the pavement for their charging cables. Simplify and reduce the cost of cross-pavement charging rules wherever SDC is involved.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93490

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Whilst this is a way forward it fails to address rural needs'. This identifies car parks owned by SDC. What about villages that do not have these. What provision is made for them. Currently, on street provision has gone to urban centres but failed to be provided for rural centres where older properties do not have front gardens or garages where an EV point can be provided. A much wider provision is needed.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93917

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Representation Summary:

Where the installation of chargers on main roads where individual homes cannot charge - the width of pavement should still be sufficient- and in tiddington with its very wide pavements in areas it can be done easily

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93963

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor

Representation Summary:

Make every company have charging points, until this changes, working people will not buy electric cars, the range on them is not far enough for those living in rural areas who have to commute long distances for work.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94123

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

Representation Summary:

There should also be central pressure on providers of charge points to make using them affordable - the biggest hindrance to EV take up is the cost of charging away from home.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94885

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Representation Summary:

yes

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94986

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mace

Representation Summary:

Rural areas already suffer from regular power cuts during the day, the additional demands placed on power grids for EV charging require particular attention in those locations where substantial development is proposed.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95228

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

no further comment

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95290

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Chris Edgeworth

Representation Summary:

Bishops Itchington lacks any parking space for placing EV charging facilities. Most residents of the village commute to work, eg Coventry, Birmingham or Oxford. Some residents can charge at home, but to promote wider use of electric vehicle use, space will need to be found to locate EV chargers.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95767

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

It should be noted that Part S to the Building Regulations provides technical guidance regarding charge point requirements that developers are obliged to meet. This somewhat negates the need for a robust policy on EV charging infrastructure for new developments and thus the policy should make reference to the Building Regulations instead. Further, any policy should build on the Warwick District Council Net Zero DPD, adopted in May 2024, which currently provides no specific guidance for developers in relation to the provision of EV charging points or ultra-low emission vehicles.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95777

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

Representation Summary:

N/A

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95882

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Carter

Representation Summary:

In order to achieve the desired uptake of electric vehicles central and local government and the private sector need to adopt a much more integrated approach to the provision of an adequate and affordable public charging network

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95958

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Representation Summary:

Yes. The provision of off-street car park chargers needs to be addressed urgently to enable visitors to South Warwickshire to charge their vehicles during their visit. At present there is a considerable lack of public EV chargers in the Local Centres.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96081

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr nigel Freeth

Representation Summary:

no comment

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96352

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Representation Summary:

Southam Town, District and County representatives support in principle but should go further in removing barriers to EV adoption for residents havng no on-site parking by:
1) in new developments specifying that EV charging provision be made at designated shared parking areass and
2) for existing properties, easing planning consents for installation of safe routes from dwelling to road for charge cables (e.g. approved channels across foot paths).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96515

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Representation Summary:

The provision of off-street car park chargers needs to be addressed urgently to enable visitors to South Warwickshire to charge their vehicles during their visit. At present there is a considerable lack of public EV chargers in the Local Centres.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96880

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Representation Summary:

Relying on electric cars would not be feasible for the foreseeable future due to lack of popular demand, insurance and manufacturing issues and a currently inadequate National Grid.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97057

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Representation Summary:

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97064

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Representation Summary:

This is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’), but any plans to increase EV charging facilities must have regard to local power network capacity and impact on residential properties.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97075

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Representation Summary:

EV chargers are needed in the south end of the county. District council car parks would be good locations for these.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97172

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Sir Thomas White’s Charity and The King Henry VIII Endowed Trust, Warwick

Agent: Stansgate Planning

Representation Summary:

The final paragraph of Draft Policy Direction 32 indicates there will be a robust policy for the provision of EV charging infrastructure in new developments. Framework paragraph 16 f) states that Development Plans should serve a clear purpose, avoiding unnecessary duplication of policies that apply to a particular area. Electric Vehicle Charging Points, with associated infrastructure, are required under Building Regulations Approved Document S for all new dwellings and commercial developments. As such, there is no need for the duplication within planning policy and the references should be removed.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97200

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97275

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

It should be noted that Part S to the Building Regulations provides technical guidance regarding charge point requirements that developers are obliged to meet. This somewhat negates the need for a robust policy on EV charging infrastructure for new developments and thus the policy should make reference to the Building Regulations instead. Further, any policy should build on the Warwick District Council Net Zero DPD, adopted in May 2024, which currently provides no specific guidance for developers in relation to the provision of EV charging points or ultra-low emission vehicles.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97534

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP

Representation Summary:

Yes, but please no dual use parking spaces as in the West end of Chestnut Walk in Stratford. Either electric vehicle charging spaces or parking spaces but not either or.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97779

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Representation Summary:

General reliance on electric vehicles remain very uncertain for the foreseeable future due to lack of adequate infrastructure eg. National Grid, lack of popular demand and attendant issues such as insurance.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97996

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Fox

Representation Summary:

it is clear in 2040 - any new house should as standard have a fast charger attached - and the infrastructure assessment should consider this need in any assessment.
It is not just about car parks

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98123

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

It should be noted that Part S to the Building Regulations provides technical guidance regarding charge point requirements that developers are obliged to meet. This somewhat negates the need for a robust policy on EV charging infrastructure for new developments and thus the policy should make reference to the Building Regulations instead. Further, any policy should build on the Warwick District Council Net Zero DPD, adopted in May 2024, which currently provides no specific guidance for developers in relation to the provision of EV charging points or ultra-low emission vehicles.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98577

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Holly Farm Business Park

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

Holly Farm Business Park already provides vehicle charging facilities for the use of employees and visitors to the business park. As a business it is committed to increasing the number of charging points in line with increasing demand.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98635

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

It should be noted that Part S to the Building Regulations provides technical guidance regarding charge point requirements that developers are obliged to meet. This somewhat negates the need for a robust policy on EV charging infrastructure for new developments and thus the policy should make reference to the Building Regulations instead. Further, any policy should build on the Warwick District Council Net Zero DPD, adopted in May 2024, which currently provides no specific guidance for developers in relation to the provision of EV charging points or ultra-low emission vehicles.