Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 86113
Received: 12/01/2025
Respondent: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 86121
Received: 12/01/2025
Respondent: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 86942
Received: 31/01/2025
Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
-
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 87425
Received: 08/02/2025
Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day
None
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 87600
Received: 09/02/2025
Respondent: mrs susan morris
I agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 89087
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
i generally agree. Weight limits and other traffic calming measures should be used to deter commercial vehicles from using rat runs or unsuitable roads
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 89275
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Jon Knight
It would seem sensible to maintain existing limitations until such time as neighbouring authorities wish to change it. I am left wondering why they are proposing that though: are they planning large employment development zones near the edge of SWLP area that would be likely to attract not only HGVs through our roads but also be a potential employment draw from places like Meon Vale and LMAGV? Would that affect the transport requirements towards Stratford/Warwick if there are lots of jobs to the west instead?
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 89782
Received: 21/02/2025
Respondent: Susana Pais
Should be removed and roads developed for the designated purpose of hgv movement
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 90297
Received: 23/02/2025
Respondent: Mr Kim James
Retention of the Vale of Evesham Control Zone is essential:
a) The policy remains necessary to manage business-related HGV movements effectively and mitigate environmental and infrastructure-related concerns. Retaining the policy will ensure continued protection for the region’s residents and road networks.
b) The policy seeks to control the number of additional HGV movements within the area resulting from business developments.
c) The policy thereby seeks to reduce the impact of HGV vehicles on local communities.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 91334
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Transport for West Midlands
Freight and logistics are addressed by proposing more efficient movement of goods while mitigating local impacts. However, coordination with neighbouring authorities is crucial to ensure that HGV routing does not displace congestion onto unsuitable roads outside South Warwickshire. They will need to ensure conditions such as weight limits as well as enforcement measures are aligned across jurisdictions. Would be interesting to know whether freight consolidation centres are being considered to reduce last-mile HGV traffic as they have been in neighbouring authorities.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 91544
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson
Speedy removal may have unintentended consequences. It was put there for a purpose in the first place.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 91704
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman
Sensible
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 92060
Received: 27/02/2025
Respondent: Salford Priors Parish Council
Retention of the Vale of Evesham Control Zone is essential:
a) The policy remains necessary to manage business-related HGV movements effectively and mitigate environmental and infrastructure-related concerns. Retaining the policy will ensure continued protection for the region’s residents and road networks.
b) The policy seeks to control the number of additional HGV movements within the area resulting from business developments.
c) The policy thereby seeks to reduce the impact of HGV vehicles on local communities.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 92495
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Julian Brown
No i do not agree with such a restrictive policy. Harmful to UK PLC growth by controlling HGVs. Good planning and development can mitigate this with road and infrastructure. Get some better planners.
This policy should be removed / improved at this state not until you kick the can down the road as you have done. Do it now!
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 92646
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Bex Thomson
No comment don’t agree if it involves green belt
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 93030
Received: 01/03/2025
Respondent: Ms Alison Blake
Absolutely
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 93964
Received: 02/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor
Pollution from HGVs is unbearable already for those living on the A435.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 95231
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Kineton Parish Council
no further comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 95960
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96354
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Southam Town Council
Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96545
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97062
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Alcester Town Council
Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) agree that this Control Zone should remain.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97087
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: John Dinnie
There are other areas that could benefit from a similar approach.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97202
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97838
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98708
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Cotswold District Council
Cotswold District Council is now also retaining this policy in its Local Plan until an alternative approach is agreed.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100014
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council
The south warwickshire lorry routes plan is critical and should be maintained. There are a substantial number of roads that cannot take large lorries and have restrictions in place. In additon, many of the river avon bridge crossings, many of which are listed buildings, have vehicle weight limits on them. There is significant non compliance already regarding these weight limits and fewer controls will result in significant damage to theses heritage assets.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100359
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades
I agree that there needs to be a control over HGV movements in the Vale of Evesham. This should also be considered in other areas of South Warwickshire.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100438
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott
NA
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101714
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason
This development is not good for the area