Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 140

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94375

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

Representation Summary:

Local green spaces should be safeguarded. The councils should not be relying on the few adopted Neighbourhood Plans. It is their duty to allocate local Green Spaces for protection within their local plans and be proactive in regards to this important designation.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94959

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Representation Summary:

ocal green spaces sohuld be safeguarded.
Open spaces sohuld be safeguarded.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95089

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Grimes

Representation Summary:

43a - We need to protect, safeguard and never build on or close to our local green space
43c - Open spaces also need to be protected and maintained permanently

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95253

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

no further comment

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95278

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

Representation Summary:

These Councils should not be relying on the few adopted Neighbourhood Plans. It is their duty to allocate Local Green Spaces for protection within their local plans and be proactive in regards to this important designation. Local Green Spaces are fundamental to the wellbeing and mental health of local populations, over and above the critical place they hold within the environment and its sustainability.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95361

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

Representation Summary:

Yes green space should be protected/provided - again though, hopefully the draft policy is not just lip service.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95476

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sue Cuff

Representation Summary:

The Councils should not be relying on the few adopted Neighbourhood Plans. It is their duty to allocate Local Green Spaces for protection within their local plans and be proactive in regards to this important designation.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95535

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Freeman

Representation Summary:

The Councils should not be relying on the few adopted Neighbourhood Plans. It is their duty
to allocate Local Green Spaces for protection within their local plans and be proactive in
regards to this important designation.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95780

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

Whilst the broad purpose of the Policy Direction is supported, it is unconsidered unnecessary to carry forward Local Green Spaces already designated in Neighbourhood Plans as these are already established. With regard to any new Local Green Spaces, clear evidence should be provided that these meet the tests set out in NPPF Paragraph 107.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95892

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Carter

Representation Summary:

The protection of local open spaces would be strengthened if the setting and amenity of public footpaths were to be protected. Public footpaths are an essential part of the green and blue infrastructure and fulfil a key leisure and amenity role as linear open spaces available to the community

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95970

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Representation Summary:

Yes. Will there be any mechanism for existing settlements to address existing shortfalls in local green spaces?

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96073

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

Representation Summary:

This is again entirely aspirational twaddle. The mass sprawl of development and solar panels will destroy wildlife habitat on a grand scale. The focus on special sites and reserves is a hugely insular way of viewing our superb countryside and ignoring the benefits of agricultural land to both feeding the population and giving mental health relief.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96090

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Tamsin Kashap

Representation Summary:

No. The Councils should not be relying on the few adopted Neighbourhood Plans. It is their duty to allocate Local Green Spaces for protection within their local plans and be proactive in regards to this important designation.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96132

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rosemary Collier

Representation Summary:

No. The Councils should not be relying on the few adopted Neighbourhood Plans. It is their duty to allocate Local Green Spaces for protection within their local plans and be proactive in regards to this important designation.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96366

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Representation Summary:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96508

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Representation Summary:

A process is required for existing settlements to address existing shortfalls in local green spaces.
There appears to be no initiative to examine how the PRoW network might be developed to ‘open up’ the surrounding countryside.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96656

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Nixon

Representation Summary:

More open spaces should be allocated for all new developments. Not just existing sites. More open spaces!!!

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96870

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97083

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Representation Summary:

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97125

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Representation Summary:

There also needs to be a route or mechanism whereby new green spaces can be enabled in areas where the land is in private ownership. This could be through community involvement in Neighbourhood Plans.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97221

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97280

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

Whilst the broad purpose of the Policy Direction is supported, it is unconsidered unnecessary to carry forward Local Green Spaces already designated in Neighbourhood Plans as these are already established. With regard to any new Local Green Spaces, clear evidence should be provided that these meet the tests set out in NPPF Paragraph 107.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97810

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Representation Summary:

N/A

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97899

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Representation Summary:

Local green spaces should be safeguarded

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97947

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

Representation Summary:

no comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98132

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

Representation Summary:

Whilst the broad purpose of the Policy Direction is supported, it is unconsidered unnecessary to carry forward Local Green Spaces already designated in Neighbourhood Plans as these are already established. With regard to any new Local Green Spaces, clear evidence should be provided that these meet the tests set out in NPPF Paragraph 107.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98394

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr

Representation Summary:

Principal goals are fine, however regular supervision and appropriate maintenance resources need to be in place.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98528

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Newbould

Representation Summary:

na

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98631

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Representation Summary:

Whilst the broad purpose of the Policy Direction is supported, it is considered unnecessary to carry forward Local Green Spaces already designated in Neighbourhood Plans as these are already established. With regard to any new Local Green Spaces, clear evidence should be provided that these meet the tests set out in NPPF Paragraph 107.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98685

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Representation Summary:

The Councils should not be relying on the few adopted Neighbourhood Plans. It is their duty to allocate Local Green Spaces for protection within their local plans and be proactive in regards to this important designation.