Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 150

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90435

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Peter Morris

Representation Summary:

If this area is to be developed transport links across the A46 to Hampton Magna should be included to ease the congestion that already exists around the Birmingham Road roundabout. It would also be a fantastic opportunity to modernise the digital infrastructure connecting to Hampton Magna and Hatton.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90580

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Warwick Town Council

Representation Summary:

Strongly object to development located here, prone to flooding from Gog Brook, also subject to high levels of pollution and noise form the A46, situated next to St Mary's Lands which is a public green space where efforts are being made to protect wildlife and enhance the space for everyone. Serious infrastructure concerns where cars are feeding onto an doff the A46.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90584

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Jacquey Parker

Representation Summary:

I disagree with all the development

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90777

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Maxine Mayer

Representation Summary:

I would not support the loss of the racecourse due to the tourism it brings to Warwick I would also not support what is an extension of the Chase Meadow development - which poorly designed. Even he bus can't access it without mounting pavements in 3 locations. This site would also be suitable for hospital expansion and should be protected as such for this purpose.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91006

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Representation Summary:

Agree. Good location and area for access to core infrastructure - main roads, motorway and rail network.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91931

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

Representation Summary:

This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91956

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Wilson

Representation Summary:

I am against this being included due to: the impact on the rural character of the area; the visual impact on the area viewed from the adjacent St. Mary's Lands; loss of public footpaths through the area, enjoyed for their location in green space; the loss of trees and hedgrows in the proposed area; the detrimental impact on Gog Brook; the loss of habitats for wildlife.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92007

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Kevin Brown

Representation Summary:

This area has good communication links vis the A46 / M40 and should have a lower impact on existing residents / businesses than other areas identified.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92087

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Deborah Wilson

Representation Summary:

I am against this being included due to: the impact on the rural character of the area; the visual impact on the area viewed from the adjacent St Mary's Lands ; loss of public footpaths through the area , enjoyed for their location in green space; the loss of trees and hedgerows in the proposed areas;the loss of habitats for wildlife and the detrimental impact on Gog Brook.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92123

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Deanna Fernie

Representation Summary:

Access to major road system A46; non-Green Belt.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92135

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Marc Weissenberger

Representation Summary:

It's greenbelt. Additionally, the district is already absolutely choked with traffic and Warwick Hospital is not coping. Birth rates are now declining.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92296

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

Representation Summary:

this is an appropriate extension of Warwick

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92391

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ted and Zbigniew Jasinski

Representation Summary:

This area is approximately 53Ha which is not in green belt and therefore a prime site for development having the advantage of existing infrastructure and local employment opportunities..

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92681

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Yates

Representation Summary:

Concerns included addition water provision additional sewage additional demands for electricity internet without any mention as to how the overload is going to be managed without reducing the present services provided.
Additional traffic will add to further congestion on roads that cannot cope now. No mention of road widening new access routes to A46 A4177 or M40.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92702

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margot Rowdon

Representation Summary:

Continuing massive amount of building in the area to the south of SG08- Chase Meadow and Tournament Fields, with a loss of space for wildlife. Also lots of building at Hampton Magna in the fields. SG08 is not naturally connected- out on a limb?
SG08 will lead to loss of green fields and hedges. Too close to A46 so unsightly noise barriers would have to be used . Brook nearby-what is flood risk? Too close to Racecourse which is heavily used by walkers and racecourse related activities. How will traffic leave the site?

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92760

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Wendy Eldred

Representation Summary:

This is one of the last green spaces in central Warwick, next to ancient woodland and protected species of birds who nest here every year. This land must be treated with immense respect so that we continue to enjoy the biodiversity within Warwick we are lucky to have around St Mary’s Lands. Development on this land would forever destroy this for future generations of wildlife and locals. This land should be protected FROM development rather than earmarked for development.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92897

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

Representation Summary:

Infill location, built up on all sides around that area.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93066

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

Representation Summary:

Warwick and its environs have had their share of ‘growth’ in the last 10 years. Time to let another area enjoy the benefits.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93106

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Naomi McAinsh

Representation Summary:

It is not greenbelt land

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93423

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

Representation Summary:

Close to A46 and suitable for development.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93611

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

Representation Summary:

This site is well supported by the existing infrastructure of the A46 and proximity to Warwick Parkway Station which has excellent facilities for parking. It is also is in close proximity to all the existing significant community services and facilities in Warwick town centre and could access further local community resources in Chase Meadow opposite/over the Henley Road.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93764

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carla Smith

Representation Summary:

We are applying for 6th Form 2025, and two have said that they’re unprecedentedly oversubscribed. One issued us with an early rejection, citing the number of applicants this year, despite our student having the required predicted grades for entry.
Went to Warwick A&E in 02/25–no seats free in waiting room, was there for hours, dr examined me stood in the corridor, due to lack of space.
Birmingham Road is often backed up headed east toward Warwick/A46–often 2 miles past Hatton Arms Pub.
Inappropriate to develop Green Belt.
It is already difficult to get a GP appointment at Priory.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94257

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Stephanie Taylor

Representation Summary:

I believe it will encroach on important wildlife habitats, whilst also increasing further pressure on healthcare services within the district. Notably A&E services which are already stretched, with it placed in the highest category for the first time regarding how stretched they are, in recent months. There are already limited school placements within the Warwick area, and with parents needing to travel further - increasing congestion on roads and increasing pollution.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94316

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: mr william tansey

Representation Summary:

Very Special circumstances for including greenbelt land have not been met.
This area abuts a wide area of openness between Warwick and Redditch and perhaps represents a least worst option for greenbelt use from an openness and preventing urban sprawl perspective.
It already contributes significantly to recreation, health and biodiversity so inclusion may not support the SWLP overall aims.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94423

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steve Taylor

Representation Summary:

SCG08 - Strategic Growth Location West of Warwick Group - OBJECT

Road infrastructure inadequate to accommodate large goods vehicles/increased traffic volume. Increased traffic will cause further congestion in and around existing residential areas where there is evidence of congestion and ques acessing traffic controlled island/access to A46 during peak communiting hours. Furher congestion will impact existing congestion exiting A46 onto the Birmingham Road. Further exaberated by potential impacts of SGO7 proposal and Hatton development 8000 homes and increased traffic volume and congestion (Site B1). Road infrastructure inadequate rat run traffic routes through Chase Meadow, Hampton on Hill and Hampton Magna.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94429

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Belinda Brown

Representation Summary:

This is non-green belt land and therefore a much more appropriate potential development site. No homes should be being built on green belt land as a part of this SWLP, when there are other sites, including this one, available!

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94530

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Steen

Representation Summary:

Not Green Belt land

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94660

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Lyttle

Representation Summary:

This wider area has already been subject of further development, such as Hatton Park, Hampton Magna and the Warwick Parkway Station, resulting in the road network being congested and at a standstill for long periods at peak times which also increases air pollution. Therefore any significant housing development will just exasperate the situation for everyone.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94719

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

we have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94830

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Representation Summary:

It's is infilling an area already partially surrounded by previous development