No

Representation ID: 99094

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sarah-Jane Slack

Warwick, a historic town in England, is subject to various planning policies aimed at preserving its character and preventing urban sprawl. This plan to develop a large-scale housing estate on the edge of the Race Course would appear to be in conflict with this and would not protect Warwick's historic character and maintain its openness by controlling urban development and preventing sprawl.

Yes

Representation ID: 99114

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Jones

Development of an area not containing green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 99272

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Phelps

proportionate expansion of Warwick; nearby rail links

Yes

Representation ID: 99419

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Tibbles

Appears to be well serviced by existing Road Network, Transportation hubs, Healthcare facilities and Education establishments

Yes

Representation ID: 99666

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Sabrina Hasnaoui

Development on non green belt land. Good access to the A46 and rail access leading to employment opportunities.

Yes

Representation ID: 99766

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

It would just continue the Tournament Fields development.

No

Representation ID: 99772

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper

Local roads inadequate

No

Representation ID: 99794

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Waller

In summary, this area of land should not be included within the plan since it has important protected species present such as nesting little owl. This is a declining owl species and the loss of any nest site would push this species to further local decline

Yes

Representation ID: 99889

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Eaton

Support required development on non green belt land

No

Representation ID: 99957

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Cowie

I do not believe the infrastructure of the local area can cope with the additional traffic. Stanks Island is struggling with traffic now given the recent developments, meaning more traffic trying to flow, more often, through Hampton Magna and HOTH.

Plus I don't believe the local GP surgeries and Warwick Hospital can cope with any increase in the number of houses being built in such a short space of time.

Yes

Representation ID: 100033

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Wall

Development should prioritise brownfield sites over Green Belt land. Urban and previously developed areas already have infrastructure in place, reducing pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare. These sites are closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using brownfield land prevents environmental damage, protects biodiversity, and preserves historic landscapes. It also helps maintain community identity by preventing urban sprawl. Additionally, brownfield areas are often better suited for flood mitigation. By focusing on these locations, new housing can be delivered responsibly without harming the countryside or overburdening local services.

Yes

Representation ID: 100056

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Brooker

If more houses are needed this Location is more suitable for development than others in the district.

Yes

Representation ID: 100106

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Evan Bailey

SG08 is already surrounded by development so may as well be developed too if required.

Yes

Representation ID: 100274

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Deborah Carter

New development should focus on previously developed sites, not destroy protected Green Belt land. Urban and repurposed areas already have infrastructure in place, preventing additional strain on roads, schools, and healthcare. These locations are also closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using non-Green Belt land prevents irreversible environmental harm, safeguards biodiversity, and preserves important landscapes. It also protects communities from urban sprawl and helps to prevent flooding. By focusing on these sites, new housing can be delivered in a responsible way—without sacrificing the countryside or placing unbearable pressure on already stretched local services.

No

Representation ID: 100300

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Steph Johnson

SG08 is a ridiculous area for commercial builds of this size. This is due to the lack of road infrastructure in the area and the lack of alternative routes when any roads are out of action.

Yes

Representation ID: 100367

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Aimee Carter

New housing should be developed on land that has already been built on, not on protected Green Belt land. Urban areas and brownfield sites already have the infrastructure to support new developments, reducing the pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare.
Building in non-Green Belt areas also means:
• Less environmental damage and better protection for wildlife.
• More sustainable transport options, reducing long commutes and carbon emissions.
• Preventing towns and villages from merging and losing their unique identities.
• Reducing flood risks caused by overdevelopment.
Destroying the Green Belt isn’t the answer—there are much better options available.

No

Representation ID: 100562

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Susan Lock

excessive use of overdevelopment. building on green belt. overdevelopment. lack of road infrastructure

No

Representation ID: 100583

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Campaign to Protect Rural England - Warwickshire

SG08 comprises the fields between Warwick Racecourse and the Warwick Bypass. These fields are an important part of the setting of Warwick and are in the view from St Mary's Church tower and Guy's Tower. There are footpaths across these fields between Warwick and Hampton Magna.
The land around Warwick Parkway station, west of the A46, has lost its Green Belt role through development of extensive station car-parking. There are local authority uses of the land between the canal and the A4177 north of the railway. This would be a better location for housing, with direct access to the station.

Yes

Representation ID: 100587

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South

Support housing development on non-green belt land.

No

Representation ID: 100795

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Hermione Pantling

SG08
Objecting to development on this site due to loss of green space and fields, leading to permanent loss of biodiversity, harm wildlife and reduce the availability of green spaces for recreation.
Disruption to natural water drainage systems, increased pollution, water, air, noise.
Overcrowding, pressure and strain on existing infrastructure and services.
Permanently altering the character of the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 101230

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough Commercial

Agent: Delta Planning

Richborough Commercial supports the Strategic Growth Option West of Warwick. However, it is respectfully requested that SG08 is expanded further, to include Land North West of J15 M40 (Site 44). Please refer to comments made to Chapter 4 and Policy Direction 12 and 13 for more detail.

No

Representation ID: 101804

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Alton

This proposal will lead to the inevitable spread of Warwick into green belt countryside. The Council has not made out sufficient grounds as to why this meets the requirements of planning legislation. It creates a significant risk of Warwick spreading to villages which currently have well-defined boundaries. The existing infrastructure cannot cope with these demands. The main employment in Warwick lies on the south side of the town but access to this is significantly impacted by the roads within Warwick itself and the bridge over the River Avon. The Council's costly attempts to address this have been an expensive failure.

Other

Representation ID: 102348

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jenny Bevan

If SG08 proceeds, a footbridge over the A46 linking it to Hampton Magna must be a planning condition. Hampton Magna has long suffered from poor connectivity to Warwick, particularly impacting schoolchildren. A fully accessible footbridge for pedestrians, cyclists and wheelchair users would significantly improve links to Warwick, encouraging active travel and reducing car dependency in line with sustainability goals.

Yes

Representation ID: 102567

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Andrews

Development on non-green belt land should be prioritised over development on green belt. Total housing needs can be met without developing on green belt so morally not right to remove green belt without exceptional cause.
These areas are better supported with existing infrastructure and transport network without requiring major investment on more remote, less connected areas.
The opportunity in terms of yield is higher in these areas so there is a duty to fulfil the housing needs in the most responsible way considering this and the green belt obligations.

Yes

Representation ID: 102700

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Liz Churchill

I prefer to see all non Green-belt sites being used.

Yes

Representation ID: 102713

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Francesca Andrews

Proposed site situated within radius of existing settlement. Strong road network providing good transport infrastructure. Will drive further investment into Warwick town centre which will benefit residents and the local economy.

Other

Representation ID: 102744

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Severn Trent Water

This development will likely require treatment at Warwick - Longbridge (STW) Treatment Works, this Wastewater Treatment Works has medium capacity and high environmental constraints. Due to the size of the development, it is recommended that network upgrades will be required, alongside hydraulic modelling and engagement with STW. Overall this development site is considered a medium/high risk location, there is some capacity however in order to accommodate growth, infrastructure upgrades will be required and we would need to work closely to understand build timelines, in order to plan accordingly.

No

Representation ID: 102942

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Howard Easton

Given that all maps fail to include the route of HS2, the impact of these plans fail to indicate the how much of Warwickshire is going to be destroyed by these myopic proposals.

Yes

Representation ID: 103148

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

Richborough respectfully request that Land West of Warwick Racecourse (HELAA ID 214) be included in the SWLP for circa 660 dwellings, and circa 34ha of green infrastructure, for the following reasons:
- Priority Growth Area
- Alignment with the Spatial Growth Strategy
- Performance against Other SGs
- Alignment with the Overarching Principles and Commentary on the HELAA
- Addressing the Sustainability Appraisal Assessment
- Infrastructure Requirements
- Joint and Collaborative Approach to Development
- Delivery
- Right Choice for Development at Warwick

Yes

Representation ID: 103260

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Keith Allan

If building of new houses is to go ahead then building on non-Green belt land is more appropriate