No

Representation ID: 92216

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Karen Dent

I am concerned about the impact on our village much of which is a conservation area. The scale of development right up to our borders threatens Charlecote’s village status. We risk being swallowed up by the developments. The proposed developments would significantly damage the character and beauty of the landscape. I urge the council to rethink these plans.

Other

Representation ID: 92316

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

The road network is not great here, and there is no good public transport offering.

Other

Representation ID: 92459

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Maxine Mayer

I attach a technical report submitted for this SG area of the cumulative impact of proposed development on the A429 and M40 J15.

No

Representation ID: 92708

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Joanne Valentine

A development of this size is inappropriate for a rural area around two villages which do not have the necessary infrastructure such as schools, transport networks and healthcare to cope with the additional population.

No

Representation ID: 92773

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Watts

Significant harm to the character of the landscape
Destruction of Green Belt land and Local Wildlife Sites (see Warwickshire Wildlife Trust's objection)
Flood risk
Wellesbourne's lack of rail connectivity
Loss of best and most versatile farmland
Overdevelopment of Wellesbourne threatening its village status
Lack of educational and health facilities
Increased pollution from vehicle movements ​
Irreversible damage to the area's natural beauty
Significant threat to local wildlife and natural habitats

Yes

Representation ID: 92910

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

Not Green Belt. Extend recently developed areas. Good links to motorways/towns

No

Representation ID: 93045

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Joanne Finkel

Loss of Green space.
Lack of planning for essential infrastructure eg public transport, swimming pools, schools, hospitals, doctors, shops,
You're building ghettos not communities.

No

Representation ID: 93074

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

I cannot see enough justification for this area to be included. The roads are already congested and local services are full.

No

Representation ID: 93251

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Pam Coulston

Wellesbourne has already had more than its fair share of development.
The village suffers from lack of resources parents having to take their children to 2 different schools through lack of spaces. Patients at the Dr’s and dentist struggling to get appointments.
Flooding will only increase with climate change and the lack of flood plains bringing misery to villagers.
This beautiful ancient village full of history is swiftly losing its identity with so many warehouse’s and factories.

Other

Representation ID: 93254

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: John Murphy

Accepted as probably inevitable but be aware of the traffic impact on the A429 and the impact on Barford Bypass junctions which will need upgrading to handle more vehicles - already a problem at peak times - even worse if the proposed quarry goes ahead.

Other

Representation ID: 93442

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

Wellesbourne is a partly self-contained village and, as such, can accomode reasonable expansion, provided local amenities are expanded to provide for more people. The scale of the proposed development is probably too large in relation to the original and recent housing in the village.

No

Representation ID: 93527

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anita Markwick

I object on the grounds of quality of life, the changed face of Wellesbourne. Traffic and infrastructure is a massive problem already.
Schools are full, the Dental surgery is full and GP surgery is struggling as.
Flooding risk will be hugely increased as so much concrete will not allow for water run off.
Devastation of green areas, hedgerows etc, will hugely deplete wildlife and bird populations.

Yes

Representation ID: 93641

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

This site is a convenient extension to the already dense and recently expanded area of housing in Wellesbourne. It is in direct proximity to all the existing community services and facilities available in Wellesbourne and access to the A429 and M40 is also very convenient.

No

Representation ID: 93895

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Patrick Embleton

Without major development of basic societal needs in the area, schools, drainage , sewage, medical social services etc the proposed additional housing will irreparably harm the town and its identity. Additionally, the proposed housing development on greenfield farming land will mean there will be a gap between the new build and old town that will inevitably become built over and further risk old town flooding

No

Representation ID: 93913

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Brian & Tracey Robinson

Lack of infrastructure. Loss of airfield, flying schools and associated businesses. Loss of valuable agricultural land. Destruction of local environment. Flood risks. Overdevelopment. Increased traffic issues. Impact on air quality, additional pollution. Destruction of character and landscape. Inadequate public transport.

No

Representation ID: 93938

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Malcolm Hiles

Charlecote is a separate village and community to Wellesbourne with its own identity and should remain so for future generations. What I see with the local plan is the growth of Wellesbourne that in effect amalgamates the village into the larger conurbation of Wellesbourne. Charlecote will inevitably lose that special "village feel" without the light and noise pollution of being close to a larger light industrial and housing 'town'

No

Representation ID: 93939

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

This area has been overdeveloped in recent years and only very small developments of less than 40 homes should be considered spaced across the whole time of the plan. The existing infrastructure cannot cope.

No

Representation ID: 93961

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diana Lopez

Loss of Green Spaces.
Schools, healthcare, or transport ALREADY under pressure, and no improvements or additions are planned
Increased traffic, pollution, and pressure on overstretched services

No

Representation ID: 94023

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Molly Robbins

Wellesbourne is a rural VILLAGE these plans threaten our village standing, we don’t have the infrastructure to support anymore houses in the village, our doctors surgery, dentist and school is at max capacity! Not to mention the destruction of our lovely wildlife! I implore you NOT to go ahead with these plans for the future happiness of Wellesbourne and the lives of the people living in it depends on it. Please listen to the people rather than your pockets.

No

Representation ID: 94062

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Melissa van der Sluijs

Wellesbourne is already over populated. The school is oversubscribed, the doctors surgery is at breaking point and the dentist is full. More houses will only make this worse. Wellesbourne is meant to be a village...more houses will make it a town which will drive current residents to move away. We moved here for the countryside lifestyle and more houses will ruin this. More houses will require more schools, that is non negotiable. Wellesbourne cannot accommodate more housing. Find other land.

No

Representation ID: 94180

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kevin McFall

Absolutely no consideration given to the increased demand for services, ie dentist, doctors, schools…already been extensive building here over last few years. No improvement in infrastructure & the increased population means more traffic congestion and more pollution. Loss of green spaces, shows nothing but utter contempt for village and community already here.

No

Representation ID: 94218

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Andrew Close

This proposal is worrying given the amount of housing/mixed use proposed when compared to other areas of similar sizes. The density is wrong and its location is clearly not sustainable; nowhere near a mainline train station. Car travel and air pollution will increase and must mean both the site-specific and cumulative impacts can't be mitigated to any appropriate satisfaction. The SA document conclusions indicating the potential for development here are far too high-level and should be reviewed. This option appears contrary other plan's policies.

No

Representation ID: 94272

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lucy Slater

I am writing to formally object to the planning application for the construction of houses on the field located behind the properties “Long Ground” and “The Old Orchard” along Lowes Lane in Wellesbourne (Site Ref 623: Lowes Lane/Walton Road – Well.07B). I object to this development based on numerous issues that make this site unsuitable for residential development.

No

Representation ID: 94275

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Jo Brown

I object to this! Wellesbourne does not have the infrastructure to meet the needs of this development. The school in wellesbourne and surrounding areas are already full. The G.P practices are already full. We have seen increased flooding due to recent housing developments and this will exacerbate the issue will no space for water to flow/drain. Wellesbourne already struggles with Traffic flow, which will be made worse by the new Quarry at ..., meaning the extra cars this plan will create will cause even more traffic chaos. It is an unsustainable long term solution

Other

Representation ID: 94278

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr john cooknell

This site is on the WCC minerals protection zone (sand and gravel). Prior extraction of the minerals will be carried out.
Your strategic vision should highlight the gravel quarrying requirements.

Yes

Representation ID: 94439

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Belinda Brown

This is non-green belt land and therefore a much more appropriate potential development site. No homes should be being built on green belt land as a part of this SWLP, when there are other sites, including this one, available!

No

Representation ID: 94473

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Gilhooly

Adverse impact on heritage and conservation status of Charlecote Village. Disproportionate overdevelopment of a village. Environmental and landscape concerns. Limited infrastructure to support additional housing. Road access not suitable for increased traffic.

No

Representation ID: 94544

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

While these are not considered as a new settlement, the potential agglomeration size means that they may function in a similar way. With no fast connectivity such as rail, and with buses providing the only viable public transport to Stratford-upon-Avon, the effects on traffic in the town and approaches would be untenable. TTG do not support these locations without a proper traffic assessment and planned infrastructure improvements in advance of development.

Yes

Representation ID: 94549

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Steen

Not Green Belt

No

Representation ID: 94593

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Michael Thomas

I have concerns about the traffic and infrastructure issues in Wellesbourne, particularly with the proposed construction of thousands of new homes. Currently, parking and traffic congestion are significant problems, exacerbated by delivery vehicles and market days. If 5,000 new homes are built, it could lead to 40,000 additional vehicles, creating gridlock. Furthermore, I question how utilities and services can be expanded when existing providers struggle. There seems to be little consideration for sustainable energy solutions, like solar power. Additionally, there are conflicting plans regarding the future use of Wellesbourne Airfield, leaving the local community without constructive answers.