No

Representation ID: 91449

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

This site is very concerningly directly adjoining an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Additionally, the proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: Meon Vale LWS, River Avon LWS and the greenway, dismantled railway, Welford Hill Farm Meadows PLWS, Rumerhill Coppice PLWS and Coxmere Coppice PLWS

No

Representation ID: 91460

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Duncombe

Though this seems a logical place for further development, it should not go ahead without improvements to infrastructure in the district to handle yet more travel the will inevitably arise from this.

Yes

Representation ID: 91471

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Donna Goodwin

New settlements are better than just adding to oversubscribed existing towns with their congested roadways and facilities. New settlements are driven by strategic opportunities and not arbitrary land availability. They do not add to the urban sprawl and pressures on existing infrastructures. Such sites do not impact greenbelt land which should be always preserved. Furthermore, it does not add to the urban sprawl or congestion of Stratford upon Avon. Job opportunities and quality of life are greatly enhanced with excellent road connections and the potential for rail connection with the rail innovation centre connecting to the Honeybourne line.

Yes

Representation ID: 91805

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Jonathon Gibson

This area is suitable for development due to existing infrastructure and settlements. Limited impact on natural environment.

Yes

Representation ID: 91849

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Hanno Kirner

Good, as takes traffic out of Stratford, c good transport links, not an extension of Stratford into the countryside, plenty of companies and jobs nearby

Yes

Representation ID: 91897

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Paula Holmes

1. Brownfield & Non-Greenbelt Land Availability
2. Existing & Planned Infrastructure
3. Economic & Community Benefits

Yes

Representation ID: 91945

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kitten Von mew

As long as their are good amenities like Meon Vale and a good public transport service.

No

Representation ID: 91947

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Priestman

The various studies that have been undertaken have failed to demonstrate how the highway infrastructure can be delivered satisfactorily.
The current highway proposals have proven to be aspirational and not deliverable thus holding up development, so adding 10,000 more homes will make the poor situation worse.

No

Representation ID: 91967

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is the most unsuitable site that has been considered for development in the proposed plan. The original allocation was reliant on the western relief road which has had funding rejected twice. The highway infrastructure is already over capacity and there are queues permanently which will only get worse. The idea of a tram / rail down the Greenway is also ridiculous and too costly. The location is the further from other main highway and rail networks and the landscape is highly valuable as you travel towards the AONB. Please remove this site and any future though of development here

Yes

Representation ID: 91992

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lesley HARVEY

YES AGREE WITH THIS AREA BEING USED.

No

Representation ID: 92035

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Kevin Fletcher

The site is unsuitable for such large scale development due to significant transport constraints. The site is poorly located to the major road network.
Vehicles will need to use the B4632 and either travel through Stratford (already congested) or pass through local Cotswold villages using the local road network.
In its report WCC gave the site a red rating (multiple challenges) for transport and concluded that it should not be put forward as a new settlement site.
Traffic analysis indicates that the volume of vehicles through the villages will increase at least fivefold based on 6000 dwellings which is unacceptable.

Yes

Representation ID: 92146

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Deanna Fernie

E1 should be a first-choice option based on its non-Green Belt location, its brownfield status, and the vast are of land availability. SDC should invest in re-opening the rail link to Honeybourne that would make transport infrastructure viable, and should look at alternative road expansion to the plan previously submitted which has left the new settlement at Meon Vale unsupported. Re-opening the rail link would provide genuine access to economic centres locally (Evesham, Stratford, Worcester) and the route to Oxford and London via Moreton-in-Marsh.

Yes

Representation ID: 92189

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Heather HOLMES

Involves development of land that isn't green belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 92192

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

This is already all new housing in this area. Building further houses here would not negatively impact green belt, would meet housing needs and wouldn't negatively affect existing residents who have already purchased a new build home on a brand new site. It would encourage more infrastructure by building here.

Yes

Representation ID: 92312

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Wilkinson

A brownfield site which must be the priority for development. This location is the most suitable of all the options.

Yes

Representation ID: 92337

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

This would be a great site providing the railway connection is made so that there is connectivity with Stratford.

Yes

Representation ID: 92374

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Nigel Briggs

This site has good road links and is relatively close to centres of employment. The land has low current amenity value.

Yes

Representation ID: 92411

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Christine Slaughter

Meon Vale has been a success. Takes congestion pressure off Stratford town, less impact on greenbelt than other suggested developments, infrastructure can be included.

Yes

Representation ID: 92683

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Mervyn Longford

Considerable development completed on this site which is in need of social infrastructure now. An extensive new settlement is
now a good proposition for this site.

Yes

Representation ID: 92806

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

Creation of a new settlement would preserve existing greenbelt and allow the development of sustainable infrastructure, including links to local and national transport networks.

Yes

Representation ID: 92809

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr JAMES STEWART

New settlements are a better solution for sustainable growth. They reduce congestion pressure on Stratford by directing development elsewhere. This approach meets housing needs while preserving green belt land, protecting the natural environment. With rail connections, including the Honeybourne Line, residents benefit from efficient transport links. Unlike urban expansion, new settlements allow infrastructure—such as roads, schools, and healthcare—to be planned and built as part of the community, preventing strain on existing services. This ensures balanced, well-planned growth that supports both residents and the environment.

No

Representation ID: 92823

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Aysha Cannell

Heavens above, ridiculous assumption that the whole area can accommodate more new houses.. the impact that the new homes/vehicles will home is immense.. Having to commute now on the through roads is just stupid.. adding an extra 50 mins journey time to work.. traffic just backs up all the time.. Perhaps the planning dept would like a proposal to build additional housing in their back garden.

Yes

Representation ID: 92853

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Storey

I support the concept of new settlemnts

Yes

Representation ID: 92856

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Joy Hawker

This area has development nearby already and seems a more appropriate area to create a "New Settlement". New settlements seem preferable to areas of seemingly random developments around already existing settlements.

Other

Representation ID: 92877

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Meon Vale Residents Association

E1 includes the areas that have received planning permission and are under construction. There are currently restrictions on development taking place until improvements to the transport infrastructure around Stratford are carried out.
Studies have failed to demonstrate how the highway infrastructure can be delivered satisfactorily.
The NSA identifies transport infrastructure as the critical concern at E1. If further housing and employment development is to be allocated there must be deliverable proposals for a new ring road around Stratford and improvements to the B4632 Campden Road.
Current highway proposals have proven to be aspirational and not deliverable thus holding up development.

Yes

Representation ID: 92934

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

Not Green Belt. A new development is preferable to towns and villages sprawling into each other.

Yes

Representation ID: 92975

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Long Marston Airfield is the perfect location for development. It is already less impact on the environment. Already good connections by rail & roads to the cotswolds Oxford etc... Infrastructure development easier.

Yes

Representation ID: 93071

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Martina Hunt

This seems one of the better possibilities for development as it is a brownfield site, already is in a corridor of new settlement development and easily accessible, offering opportunities for economic growth, new jobs and better infrastructure development. Such a site will not add pressure to an already overloaded and congested town such as Stratford on Avon, and with the potential of a new Chiltern line, with a parkway station, two miles away could have a much larger economic and strategic impact in the long term for south Warwickshire.

Yes

Representation ID: 93167

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gordon Sharp

new settlements are more preferable and the same points as above for SG13 and SG14

No

Representation ID: 93168

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Julia Marriott

Long Marston is situated several miles outside of Stratford down a road that already can’t cope with the traffic volumes heading into Stratford. There is insufficient infrastructure to support this development. School and GP places are on their knees. Leisure facilities are poor. job opportunities are limited