Yes

Representation ID: 96393

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Mary Harman

This area is more suitable for large scale development as it does not directly impede on an historic village and character countryside. It does not attract mass tourism and rat run traffic. Unlike historic villages Long Marston Airfield does not contribute to local economy.

Yes

Representation ID: 96398

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Bearley Parish Council

The SWLP has 12 sites, 5 of these are Green Belt land and seven are non-Green Belt land. These seven non-Green Belt land sites have room between them for 46,500 dwellings. This includes Long Marston. The existence of these sites means that there are no ‘exceptional circumstances’ to develop any Green Belt site.

In order to comply with the National Planning Policy Framework 2024, all for these non-Green Belt sites such as Long Marston should be developed before any Green Belt site.

Yes

Representation ID: 96429

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Bearley Wilmcote Action Group

All non Green Belt sites should be developed first!

Yes

Representation ID: 96454

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs JANIE HORTON

Good option

Yes

Representation ID: 96593

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Pipitone

I wish to express that I support this proposed settlement

Yes

Representation ID: 96603

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Colin Stewart

The site has major transport issues, and the accompanying evidence which suggests that a major transport infrastructure upgrade is not necessary due to internalisation is considered not tenable. However, this is a potentially sizeable new settlement, and as such could provide a well designed setting for homes and employment. It is partly developed so should be completed and expanded, if a major transport upgrade is included and implemented in advance, which would allow traffic and HGVs to get around Stratford-upon-Avon to the strategic road network via the A46, and to the Stratford Parkway Station for sustainable onward trips.

Yes

Representation ID: 96643

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Marilyn Bates

This site has already proved itself, it works very well and the infrastructure is in place.

Other

Representation ID: 96779

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

Yes

Representation ID: 96795

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Prudence Kalinski

Long Marston would make a great new settlement, the development that has already happened in the area in what is a, so far, under developed side of Stratford would make a great basis for further development.

Yes

Representation ID: 96800

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Le Page

Site not Green Belt

Yes

Representation ID: 96823

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alveston Villagers’ Association

This would reduce the need for edge of town development in Strategic Growth areas. This site is already partly developed and provides an opportunity for a community with well designed housing and employment supported by the necessary infrastructure including upgrades to transport connections.

No

Representation ID: 96854

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jo Johnson

Build north of the river, not south

Yes

Representation ID: 96943

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Not in Green Belt
Potential very good rail connection with link to Honeybourne

Other

Representation ID: 96988

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Fearon

Long Marston Airfield has long been under development and the completion of this should be prioritised over more housing around the edges of Stratford. The Council should insist that the Long Marston developers put in facilities including doctors, schools and dentists, that I think I recall were originally promised to get planning permission but subsequently withdrawn with the agreement of the Council. The Council should take a hard line on contractors reneging on any development commitments.

Yes

Representation ID: 97020

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Morris

Less environmental impact. Prevents urban sprawl. Eases traffic congestion away from Stratford.

Yes

Representation ID: 97035

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carol Longford

Residential and employment development on this site which needs local amenities to create the new settlement

Yes

Representation ID: 97332

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lucy White

I am concerned with the increase of traffic on all major and minor approach roads in particular through Welford and then onwards to the A46 via Binton which will become an obvious cut through .

Yes

Representation ID: 97334

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Guy Morris

New settlements are a better solution than growing existing settlements putting strain on the infrastructure and increasing flood risks.

Yes

Representation ID: 97426

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Evans

-outside of green belt
-more existing road/transport opportunity
-Less impact than other "perferred option"
Woudl still need infrastructre investment on roads/schools/NHS for somthing this size

Yes

Representation ID: 97431

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Anthony Wills

New settlements are already in a position for increased housing development with provision of land in place. With new settlements infrastructure such as schools, shops surgeries and roads tends to be put in place during the building works. This tends not to be the case with Strategic Growth areas from my experience of the couple of decades.

Yes

Representation ID: 97439

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP

This is a substantial brown field site and could become a garden village with its own local amenities.

Yes

Representation ID: 97443

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Harris Lamb

Yes, we fully support the identification of Long Marston Airfield as a potential new settlement. It is suitable, sustainable and developable and can deliver a significant amount of residential and commercial development to assist in meeting the Plan’s development requirements.

Yes

Representation ID: 97497

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lisa Donovan

All sites outside the green belt have to be developed first, before green belt sites

Yes

Representation ID: 97500

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

This is a brownfield site and there are potential rail or tram links to Strratford and Honeybourne which should be seriously considered. This is a good location to build a settlement where many needs could be satisfied within a 20 minute walk as long as this was planned in advance.

Yes

Representation ID: 97551

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoffrey Benney

New settlements appear to me the only way that the infrastructure required can be achieved

Yes

Representation ID: 97681

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Melanie Elkington

I think this would solve all your housing issues. Infrastructure in the Warwickshire area as a whole is overwhelmed. If a New Settlement were built then all the necessary infrastructure could be included . The airfield seems to me to be the most sensible solution.

Yes

Representation ID: 97814

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Potential good rail transport and not in green belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 97849

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Hibbert

Would make a great strategic area to develop that can be thoughtfully planned. It would meet all the housing needs and at the same time: have the space for new infrastructure (schools, doctors, leisure centres etc); reduce urban sprawl and allow planned development in the most sustainable way (including the preservation of greenbelt land in other areas); and provides opportunity to reduce car traffic and emissions in surrounding towns though new public transport links (new train/tram line linking to Honeybourne and Stratford).

Yes

Representation ID: 97904

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beth Evans

I feel that the land near Long Marston Airfield is more suitable as it is not Greenbelt land, it would be developing an area of significant housing rather than a small village and the housing would be more in character with the area than that of a small village.

Yes

Representation ID: 97924

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Clarke

Long Marston Parish Council website sets out the advantages of this location: "...with excellent communication in terms of access to rail, road and bus networks with direct trains to London, Birmingham and Manchester, for example, from a variety of local stations, with the M5, M40 and M42 all within easy access." Existing and recent development has resulted in new infrastructure that will be a significant enabler for future development.