Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Hatton Parish Council search

Form ID: 74253

Respondent: Hatton Parish Council

Q-H1-1: The HEDNA is proposing that we move away from an approach where future household needs are based on the 2014-based household projections towards a trend-based approach. Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of housing need across South Warwickshire?

Q-H1-2: If your answer to H1-1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future housing needs for this Local Plan?

It is not reasonable to expect any forecasting model to make a useful prediction of housing and economic needs 25 years ahead. Another pandemic? The trend in WFH? Changing retail activity? Town centre evolution? Collapse of JLR? This has the same validity as the original estimate for the cost of HS2 This plan will fundamentally and irreversibly alter the character of South Warwickshire; to do so on evidence such as this is reckless and irresponsible

Form ID: 74270

Respondent: Hatton Parish Council

Option H6a: Identify a range of specific sites in sustainable locations of up to 15 pitches/plots in size to be developed only for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes.

selected

Option H6b: Require large developments of over 500 homes to provide a proportion of Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes on the edge of the overall site.

selected

Option H6c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability.

selected

Q-H7: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering homes in South Warwickshire

Why should this particular subset be treated any differently from any other?

Form ID: 74282

Respondent: Hatton Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

'New settlements' (a sickening euphemism for urban sprawl) would devastate the rural areas in which they would be located. The idea of rail corridors is a green-wishing fantasy. What evidence is there to support a significant reduction in motor travel from such a policy?

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.