Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Alcester Town Council search

Form ID: 74568

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Don't know

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 74569

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 74571

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 74572

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 74573

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 74574

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 74575

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

Support brownfield first

Form ID: 74576

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Option S2a: Identify areas considered particularly suited to intensification development, and develop a design code for each character area. Have a policy supporting intensification within these identified areas where it complies with the relevant design code.

selected

Option S2b: Have a policy with 'in principle' support for intensification development, applicable across South Warwickshire; and develop design codes

selected

Option S2c: Do not have a policy which encourages intensification

selected

Form ID: 74577

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 74578

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Q-I5: Please add any comments you wish to make about infrastructure, viability and deliverability

Important to have the grand plan plus the ability to deliver financially- we don't want a repeat of Long Marston and the South West Relief Road.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.