Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Royal Shakespeare Company search

Form ID: 77510

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Option D2a: Develop a South Warwickshire Design Guide

selected

Option D2b: Develop design guides and/or design codes for specific places (e.g. existing settlements or groups of settlements, or an 'area' in the case of a new settlement) where the spatial strategy identifies significant change.

selected

Option D2c: Develop design guides/codes for strategic development sites/locations.

selected

Option D2d: None of these

selected

Form ID: 77515

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Q-D4.1: Do you agree that this is an appropriate range of topics for a policy on the design of safe and attractive streets?

Q-D4.2: If no, please indicate why

As indicated in earlier sections, a stronger reference to accessible and inclusive design would be welcomed to ensure that wider spread of need is met. It is essential that as a minimum standard, design is meeting the requirements for wheelchair accessibility, but ultimately spaces should be accessible to all types of walking and wheeling. The RSC would also highlight the need for using public spaces to increase the cultural capacity of the area, and to do with thoughtful placemaking approaches that put local communities at the heart of space development.

Form ID: 77519

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Q-D5: Should we continue with the approach to include a high-level strategic policy within the Part 1 plan and to utilise heritage assessments to inform the growth strategy, and delay detailed policies to Part 2?

Yes

Q-D6: Please add any comments you wish to make about a well-designed and beautiful South Warwickshire

No answer given

Form ID: 77520

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Q-W1: Should the Part 1 plan include a policy on pollution?

Yes

Form ID: 77521

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Option W2a: Include a policy on Health Impact Assessments

selected

Option W2b: Do not include a policy on Health Impact Assessments

selected

Form ID: 77522

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Option W3a: Include an overall policy on health

selected

Option W3b: Do not include a policy on health

selected

Form ID: 77525

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Option T2a: Include a policy which takes a hierarchical approach in terms of prioritising transport infrastructure

selected

Option T2b: Do not include a policy which takes a hierarchical approach

selected

Form ID: 77526

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Option T3a: Include a policy encouraging more sustainable road-based transport for businesses

selected

Option T3b: – Do not include a policy encouraging more sustainable road-based transport for business

selected

Form ID: 77527

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Q-T4: Please provide suggestions for how smart cities technologies could be supported in South Warwickshire

Long term policy should aim towards the introduction of new DRT options in coming years. For example, cycle hire and electric scooter schemes in town centres, digital travel assistants providing live travel information, digital bus stops with live information, e-cargo bikes, increased EV charging and more. This approach will furtureproof transport developments that are already being used in the region and should be extended into these district in the near future.

Q-T5: Please add any comments you wish to make about a well-connected South Warwickshire

Policy should align with already consulted strategy documents at both District and County Level, such as LTP4, to further support the delivery of already prioritised schemes in Stratford Upon Avon Town. These policies should also provide clarity on how District and County authorities plan to work together to deliver well connected places. Any hierarchical policy should deprioritise car use and work towards business models for the District Council that are less reliant on car parking income. "

Form ID: 77529

Respondent: Royal Shakespeare Company

Q-P1.1: Do you agree with the proposed broad content of the Part 1 plan?

Yes

Q-P1.2: If no, please indicate why

No answer given

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.