Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Great Alne Parish Council search

Form ID: 78466

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 78478

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 78606

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 78612

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 78689

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Neutral

Option 3: Economy

Neutral

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 78693

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 78696

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 78733

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option B1a: Maintain Areas of Restraint and identify appropriate areas within Warwick District

selected

Option B1b: Remove Areas of Restraint designations

selected

Option B1c: Maintain Areas of Restraint within Stratford-on-Avon District but not introduce them into Warwick District

selected

Form ID: 78753

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-B2: Should the Policy on the Vale of Evesham Control Zone be removed, if neighbouring authorities decide not to carry the designation forward?

Yes

Form ID: 78778

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option B3a: Introduce Special Landscape Areas across all of South Warwickshire

selected

Option B3b: Maintain Special landscape Areas within Stratford-on-Avon District but don't introduce them within Warwick District

selected

Option B3c: Discard Special Landscape Areas and bolster general landscape policy

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.