Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family) search

New search

Form ID: 74787

Respondent: Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family)

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Inappropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Inappropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Neutral

Form ID: 74788

Respondent: Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family)

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 74790

Respondent: Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family)

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Yes

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

The HEDNA is an appropriate starting point for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire, although there is some concern that the methodology employed underplays the total needs. It is clear from the HEDNA that there are two types of economic need: local and strategic. Whilst it provides a district level breakdown of local office and general industrial need, it does not provide the same for the strategic warehousing and distribution need component and this needs to be addressed.

Form ID: 74791

Respondent: Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family)

Option E6a: Include a policy which protects South Warwickshire's economic assets.

selected

Option E6b: Do not include a policy protecting all these economic assets

selected

Form ID: 74793

Respondent: Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family)

Option E7.1a: Include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.1b: Do not include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.2a: Include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Option E7.2b: Do not include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Form ID: 74794

Respondent: Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family)

Q-E11: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering South Warwickshire's economic needs

Further commentary to Issue E6: We support Option E6a, to include a policy which generally protects South Warwickshire’s economic assets but such policies must always be written flexibly to allow for changes in circumstances and provide criteria for acceptable land use change. Further commentary to Issue E7: We support the inclusion of a policy that would direct employment to the Core Opportunity Area, as identified. This will help provide spatial clarity to the economic strategy and help to focus growth in the most appropriate locations

Form ID: 74795

Respondent: Delta Planning (obo landowner, Webb family)

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

Further commentary to Issue S9 We support Option S9b. It is clearly essential that the Part 1 Plan should include a fresh review of all settlement boundaries.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.