Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Radford Semele Parish Council search

Form ID: 74901

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 74903

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S7.1: Please provide any comments you have on the emissions estimation modelling for the five growth options

The lowest total emissions for the plan period is option 3 - Economy

Form ID: 74904

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Inappropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Inappropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Neutral

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 74905

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 74906

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 74907

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

We agree with the consideration of development of areas within existing green belt, to rebalance the distribution throughout areas of South Warwickshire.

Form ID: 74909

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option E2a: Include a policy which encourages businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2b: Do not include a policy encouraging businesses to be low carbon

selected

Option E2c: Include a policy which looks to identify sites or development zones which are targeted at businesses wishing to be innovative towards a low carbon economy.

selected

Form ID: 74938

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option E6a: Include a policy which protects South Warwickshire's economic assets.

selected

Option E6b: Do not include a policy protecting all these economic assets

selected

Form ID: 74945

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Option E7.1a: Include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.1b: Do not include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.2a: Include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Option E7.2b: Do not include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Form ID: 74948

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Q-E8.1: Do you agree that the existing employment allocations, including the revisions to Atherstone Airfield, should be carried over into the SWLP?

Yes

Q-E8.2: If, no please list the sites that should be excluded and give reasons.

No answer given

Q-E8.3: Do you agree that proposals seeking the loss of a business, commercial or community building or facility should be subject to marketing, viability and alternative use tests?

Yes

Q-E8.4: Pease specify what you consider to be appropriate tests

No answer given

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.