Issue and Options 2023
Search form responses
Results for Shipston on Stour Town Council search
New searchselected
selected
selected
No answer given
In the future, such buildings must not be allowed to detract from the external visual impact which must be given equal consideration. (For example white warehouses in sensitive rural locations.)
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
The SWLP needs to have a process/policy whereby current deficiencies against the objectives of the current Core Strategy are addressed to new considerations.
selected
selected
selected
There has to be better process than one that relies on 'tick boxes'. Developers need to commit to solutions that work.
selected
selected
selected
Establish and agree targets for 'betterment' beyond current flood neutrality plus 40% for climate change. This can be achieved by early (pre-planning) engagement with the relevant developer site by site so they can build in sufficient water/hold back facility to meet the agreed target for the site. We would consider that 30% betterment to be an achievable and realistic target. Such an approach also avoids the need to set limits on hard standing areas as a proportion of the site as the soil permeability of different locations will affect run off. In Shipston for example the Western slope is heavy clay and even as undeveloped fields has hardly any capacity to soak water away, hence run off is extreme in spate conditions thus larger storage/holding areas are necessary.
No answer given
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected
selected