Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for SupremeTech search

Form ID: 75077

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-E11: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering South Warwickshire's economic needs

Q-E1.1: Yes, the HEDNA is an appropriate starting point for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire, although there is some concern that the methodology employed underplays the total needs. It is clear from the HEDNA that there are two types of economic need: local and strategic. The HEDNA states that at a district level in respect of Warwick District Council, there is a need for 97ha of office and general industrial need. Q-E6: We support Option E6a, to include a policy which generally protects South Warwickshire’s economic assets but such policies must always be written flexibly to allow for changes in circumstances and provide criteria for acceptable land use change. Q-E7.1: - We support the inclusion of a policy that would direct employment to the Core Opportunity Area, as identified. This will help provide spatial clarity to the economic strategy and help to focus growth in the most appropriate locations.

Form ID: 75078

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Option E7.1a: Include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.1b: Do not include a policy directing employment to the Core Opportunity Area

selected

Option E7.2a: Include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Option E7.2b: Do not include a policy relating to additional economic growth at the major investment sites

selected

Form ID: 75079

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Option E6a: Include a policy which protects South Warwickshire's economic assets.

selected

Option E6b: Do not include a policy protecting all these economic assets

selected

Form ID: 75080

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-E1.1: Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of employment need across South Warwickshire?

Yes

Q-E1.2: If your answer to E-1.1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future employment needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 75081

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 75082

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Nothing chosen

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Nothing chosen

Option 3: Economy

Nothing chosen

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 75083

Respondent: SupremeTech

Agent: Delta Planning

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 75084

Respondent: SupremeTech

Q-S10: Please add any comments you wish to make about the development distribution strategy for South Warwickshire

Q-S4.1: Yes, growth of existing settlements should be the main option within the overall growth strategy. This ensures making best use of existing infrastructure and sustainable patterns of development. Please see full response to this at Q-S7.2. Q-S9: We support Option S9b. It is clearly essential that the Part 1 Plan should include a fresh review of all settlement boundaries.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.