Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Tanworth Residents Association search

Form ID: 80925

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

Yes - only if further development of railcorridors

Form ID: 80926

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Neutral

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Neutral

Option 3: Economy

Nothing chosen

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Nothing chosen

Option 5: Dispersed

Nothing chosen

Form ID: 80927

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 80928

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

Form ID: 80929

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Q-H2-1: What is the best way to significantly increase the supply of affordable housing across South Warwickshire?

No answer given

Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement

selected

Option H2-2b: Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts

selected

Option H2-2c: A more localised approach with separate affordable housing requirements for different localities across South Warwickshire

selected

Q-H2-3: How should South Warwickshire best address the specialist needs for older people?

No answer given

Form ID: 80930

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Option H6a: Identify a range of specific sites in sustainable locations of up to 15 pitches/plots in size to be developed only for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes.

selected

Option H6b: Require large developments of over 500 homes to provide a proportion of Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes on the edge of the overall site.

selected

Option H6c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability.

selected

Q-H7: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering homes in South Warwickshire

Q-H2-2: Option H2-2b Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on- Avon and Warwick Districts Separate affordable housing requirements for each District would go some way towards reflecting local requirements and local viability calculations. It would provide a reasonable level of certainty for developers and Councils. However, the District boundaries are unlikely to be the most accurate way of reflecting of variations in value, or variations in affordable housing demand, in different areas of South Warwickshire.

Form ID: 80931

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Q-H4-1: Do you agree with the approach of contributing to meeting the Birmingham and Black Country HMA shortfall to 2031 on the identified sites in Stratford-on-Avon District?

Q-H4-2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the scale of the shortfall from the Birmingham and Black Country HMA that South Warwickshire should accommodate within the South Warwickshire Local Plan

No answer given

Q-H4-3: If we are required to meet housing shortfalls from outside of South Warwickshire, how best and where should we accommodate such shortfalls?

See above comments at Q-S10. Green Belt should be the last option not the first.

Form ID: 80932

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Option H5a: Identify a range of specific sites within or on the edge of existing settlements of approximately 5-20 homes in size to be developed only for self and custom build homes.

selected

Option H5b: Require large developments of, say, over 100 homes to provide a proportion of self and custom-build homes within the overall site.

selected

Option H5c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for self and custom build homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability.

selected

Form ID: 80933

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Q-D1.1: Do you agree that this is an appropriate range of topics for a strategic design policy?

Yes

Q-D1.2: If no, please indicate why

No answer given

Form ID: 80934

Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association

Option D2a: Develop a South Warwickshire Design Guide

selected

Option D2b: Develop design guides and/or design codes for specific places (e.g. existing settlements or groups of settlements, or an 'area' in the case of a new settlement) where the spatial strategy identifies significant change.

selected

Option D2c: Develop design guides/codes for strategic development sites/locations.

selected

Option D2d: None of these

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.