Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Summers Holdings Ltd search

New search New search
Form ID: 84957
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

selected

selected

selected

selected

Form ID: 84959
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Yes

No answer given

Yes

No answer given

Form ID: 84960
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

No

Form ID: 84961
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Yes

Yes, but subject to review, in light of expected changes to the planning system.

Form ID: 84963
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

No answer given

selected

selected

selected

The plan should make best endeavours to meet all housing needs, including those of the elderly. It must also be recognized that many elderly people prefer to remain in their own home for as long as they are able to do so.

Form ID: 84964
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

selected

selected

selected

Q-H2.2: Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement It would seem sensible for a common approach to be the starting point. Q-H3: Option H3b: Apply Nationally Described Space Standards to developments across South Warwickshire based on locally derived evidence. This should be the starting point although we do not understand what, “based on locally derived evidence means”. Option H3c: Include a requirement to meet optional Building Regulations M4(2)/M4(3) as standard. These are focussed upon ensuring appropriate accessibility standards. This approach would be supported but needs to be applied flexibly because of potential impacts on design and viability. Q-H5: Option H5c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for self and custom build homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability. This would seem to be the most appropriate option with support where there is either an identified shortfall across the plan area generally or specifically where a shortfall within a specific locality.

Form ID: 84967
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

selected

selected

selected

selected

Form ID: 84968
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Yes

Q-H4.1: The plan should take account of cross-boundary requirements prior to 2031 and beyond. It is unclear why the question specifies either ‘on identified sites’ or Stratford-on-Avon District alone. Q-H4.2: This should preferably be based on agreed outcomes arising from discussions by the authorities concerned. If there is no agreement, then past migration trends should be used as the basis for distributing any cross-boundary requirements.

In the past development capacity closer to the origin would have been emphasized. In the light of changing work patterns and a higher propensity to work from home a loosening of that approach might be more appropriate. It is also appropriate to bear in-mind that migration moves are made within the housing stock and not just new-build, so the existing stock can still enable migrants to live close to their point of origin should they wish to do so.

Form ID: 84969
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

selected

selected

selected

Form ID: 84970
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

selected

selected

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.