Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Harbury Parish Council search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question F1
Representation ID: 92342
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
there is no public transport option here and the road network is already congested, and it would merge Radford, Harbury and Ufton. The site is currently being used for a solar farm meeting our energy needs.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question F2
Representation ID: 92344
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
there is poor rail/road infrastructure here, and would merge Bishop's Itchington, Ladbroke and Deppers Bridge.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question F3
Representation ID: 92345
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
poor rail/road infrastructure
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question G1
Representation ID: 92348
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
similar issues with poor rail/road connections and the M40 is a natural boundary to GLH
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question X1
Representation ID: 92350
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
already a split junction on the M40, no rail connections, risks merging Leamington with Barford
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question X2
Representation ID: 92352
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
currently the football ground, and earmarked for a traveller's site. No public transport access, including rail within easy reach. Risks being an extension of Whitnash rather than a separate settlement. Detrimental impact on nearby historic sites
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question BW
Representation ID: 92353
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
The nearby rail station makes this a suitable location for development.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
Representation ID: 92355
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
We think three of the settlements at Hatton, Long Marston and Bearley are appropriate and sustainable. Two have rail stations already, and if one can be provided at Long Marston that will make it more sustainable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
Representation ID: 92359
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
Due consideration should be paid to the fact that some locations in the SWLP will have seen considerable development in the last core strategy period, and might now be under strain in terms of services etc. A piecemeal approach risks overlooking the cumulative impact of development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
Representation ID: 92361
Received: 28/02/2025
Respondent: Harbury Parish Council
We think that neighbouring authorities need to work harder to meet demand, including repurposing buildings etc.
