Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Stratford upon Avon District Council search
New searchYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
Representation ID: 89017
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
But the ability to extend houses, particularly in rurl areas must be kerbed
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
Representation ID: 89019
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
In large developments and growth areas some land should be set aside for custom and self build to allow opportunities for smaller developers. These should not be free standing exceptional developments.
The custom and self build register needs to be chargeable and rigorously kept up to date.
This Government policy must not be a route for developers to be able to overrule general presumptions against development. This policy debases public confidence in the planning system
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
Representation ID: 89020
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Adequate land must be set aside in new settlements or growth areas to accommodate these developments. They must not be left to chance or afterthought
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Delivering Homes that Meet the Needs of all our communities chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 89022
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
it is vital that these needs are accommodated in the plans.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 12-Locations for Employment Growth?
Representation ID: 89025
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Preference should be given to sites that will attract quality employment - Science and technology, R&D, Manufacturing, administration. Large scale warehousing, retail warehousing, garden centres should only be provided with cler evidence of unmet demand.
High levels of design and landscaping are required in all cases
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-13-Core Opportunity Area?
Representation ID: 89026
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
I see no need for a "core Area" and consider that all policies should be Plan area wide. I think this adds nothing to the plan
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 14- Major Investment Sites (MIS)?
Representation ID: 89028
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
In respect of Wellesbourne Airfield the plan should make representation to the viability and sustainability of the Airfield
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-15- Provision of Office Accommodation and Refurbishment of Existing Office Stock?
Representation ID: 89030
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
I agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-16-Airfields?
Representation ID: 89031
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
The Airfield must be retaining for viable and sustainable air operations. The site is suitable for manufacturing and uses related to the airfield and should not be used for further largescale wrehousing
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-17- A Low carbon Economy?
Representation ID: 89032
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council
I agree
