Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Tanworth Residents Association search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question C1
Representation ID: 89124
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
Existing rural nature needs to be preserved in line with your stated Strategic Objectives.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question B1
Representation ID: 89125
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
Existing rural nature needs to be preserved in line with your stated Strategic Objectives.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?
Representation ID: 89127
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
It needs the addition of a clear statement that the Green Belt in SDC north of Henley will be protected at all costs. New settlements or expanded existing settlements will only be considered when all available sites elsewhere have been exhausted.
Given the proximity of Redditch, Bromsgrove, Birmingham and Solihull, the need for more and more houses must not override the avoidance of urban sprawl that this part of Green Belt provides.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?
Representation ID: 89128
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
We oppose the revision of existing Green Belt Boundaries.
There must be no question of allocating target numbers to BUABs in Green Belt. Applications must continue to be determined on an individual basis and decided on their merits.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
Representation ID: 89131
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
By all means co-operate with neighbouring authorities, but not by building just over the county line in our Green Belt. Accommodate their shortfall elsewhere in South Warwickshire - and not in Green Belt.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
Representation ID: 89133
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
Thank goodness Rail gets a mention.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
Representation ID: 89134
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
Welcome mention of Long Marston to Stratford Line, but where is the Kineton Spur extension to Lighthorne Heath?
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
Representation ID: 89136
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
The Stage 2 Review process needs to be clearly "Green Belt Last".
It also will need to distinguish between Green Belt in sensitive areas where there are large predators nearby and the avoidance of urban sprawl is paramount and those areas where special character or safeguarding the countryside are the most important considerations.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
Representation ID: 89141
Received: 19/02/2025
Respondent: Tanworth Residents Association
There needs to be at least a desire for better rail connections and less emphasis on roads and buses we do not have.
