Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
Representation ID: 103500
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 326 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
Representation ID: 103522
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
It is recommended that the SWLP team should lead on the production of the settlement specific design codes (with inputs from Neighbourhood Planning Groups) and these should come forward at the same time as the SWLP with the focus on enabling housing delivery as soon as possible.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?
Representation ID: 103547
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 103564
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?
Representation ID: 103586
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?
Representation ID: 103601
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough broadly support the approach within Draft Policy Direction 32, and note that Part S of the Building Regulations sets out the requirements for EV charging in new developments. Any EV Infrastructure Strategy should align with Building Regulations and national policy.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?
Representation ID: 103626
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?
Representation ID: 103643
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough supports Draft Policy Direction 35 in principle, specifically in relation to all new residential developments including appropriate wired and wireless infrastructure to provide high speed internet access. However, it is considered that sufficient flexibility should be built-in to the policy to allow for future changes and feasibility considerations.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 103653
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?
Representation ID: 103667
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Agent: Turley
Richborough support the preparation of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy (LNRS) (in line with the Environment Act 2021), and welcome the opportunity to review and comment on the LNRS once prepared.
