Preferred Options 2025

Search representations

Results for Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne search

New search New search

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Climate Resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 103469

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough broadly supports the proposals in the ‘A Climate Resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire chapter’ however, further consideration is required with regards to national policy requirements and viability.

The plan period for the SWLP is 25 years, and over this time national policy will change significantly as will the viability and feasibility of such schemes once new technologies become available and more cost efficient. The SWLP needs to allow room for these potential changes without also placing onerous and unviable restrictions on development that will take place in the shorter term.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?

Representation ID: 103504

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 325 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?

Representation ID: 103525

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

It is recommended that the SWLP team should lead on the production of the settlement specific design codes (with inputs from Neighbourhood Planning Groups) and these should come forward at the same time as the SWLP with the focus on enabling housing delivery as soon as possible.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?

Representation ID: 103549

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 103565

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?

Representation ID: 103587

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?

Representation ID: 103609

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough broadly support the approach within Draft Policy Direction 32, and note that Part S of the Building Regulations sets out the requirements for EV charging in new developments. Any EV Infrastructure Strategy should align with Building Regulations and national policy.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?

Representation ID: 103627

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?

Representation ID: 103644

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough supports Draft Policy Direction 35 in principle, specifically in relation to all new residential developments including appropriate wired and wireless infrastructure to provide high speed internet access. However, it is considered that sufficient flexibility should be built-in to the policy to allow for future changes and feasibility considerations.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

Representation ID: 103657

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.