Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for IM Land 1 Limited search
New searchOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Delivering Homes that Meet the Needs of all our communities chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 102146
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
61. IM Land broadly supports the proposals subject to the suggested amendments and considerations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-17- A Low carbon Economy?
Representation ID: 102149
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
62. IM land supports the need for new development to reduce carbon emissions and incorporate climate resilience measures.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-F- Decentralised Energy Systems?
Representation ID: 102155
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
63. The provision of decentralised energy systems and incorporating heating, power and cooling into new developments needs to consider the implications of the 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and whether the provision of heat networks is feasible and viable.
64. IM Land supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. However, further consideration as part of the next stage of the SWLP needs to be given to the feasibility and viability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?
Representation ID: 102159
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
65. IM Land supports the transition to delivering Net Zero development, however, has concerns over elements of the policy as currently drafted which go against national Government guidance, implications with regards to design and maintenance which have not been thought through, and will have viability issues not yet considered.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 24- Embodied carbon?
Representation ID: 102166
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
IM Land recommend that the approach set out in the Warwick Net Zero DPD and supporting SPD is followed, which requires the consideration and reduction of upfront embodied carbon, without setting a specific target at this stage. The application of specific targets needs to be fully considered as part of the Plan evidence base and viability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy G- Climate Resilient Design?
Representation ID: 102171
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
69. IM Land supports the consideration of climate change and resilience in the design of new development. The application of any specific targets which go beyond the requirements of the Building Regulations or national guidance needs to be fully considered as part of the Plan’s evidence base and viability assessment.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-H- Water Efficiency?
Representation ID: 102178
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
70. IM Land broadly support Draft Policy H. However, the policy does go beyond the requirements of the Building Regulations higher water efficiency standard and so, costs will need to be considered as part of development viability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- I- Water Supply and Wastewater Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 102181
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
71. IM Land broadly support Draft Policy I. Whilst water quality from the development can be managed and controlled, the ability to influence water quality outside of the site is limited. This should be recognised within the policy wording.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- K- Multifunctional Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)?
Representation ID: 102188
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
72. The policy sets out that SuDs should be above ground, given the opportunities to provide biodiversity and water quality enhancements. However, this may not always be the most appropriate drainage option. Accordingly, the policy wording should be updated to note that SuDs will be considered on a site-by-site basis in accordance with the SuDs hierarchy, with a preference for above ground interventions.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Climate Resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 102194
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited
Agent: Turley
73. IM Land broadly supports the proposals subject to the consideration of our comments on Draft Policy Direction 17, F, 22, 24, G,H, I, and K.
