Preferred Options 2025
Search representations
Results for Exhall Parish Council search
New searchNo
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG20 Question
Representation ID: 106791
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Exhall Parish Council
Lack of sustainable travel options:
•Lack of train station in Bidford
•No active bus service between Bidford and the Graftons or on the Wixford Road
No provision to improve the A46 between Alcester roundabout and Stratford/Wildmoor roundabout to accommodate the increase in traffic that will be on that road that will arise from increased housing.
Objections to SG20 & Refid 562
•It is sited within an area of high visual impact
•Coalescence between Bidford and Ardens Grafton
•Land is currently actively farmed – grade 1 & 2
•2021 SHLAA Land Parcels previously rejected some of the proposed fields (BD03 & BD04) nominated in SG20 on the grounds of environmental suitability, landscape impact , settlement character and agricultural land quality . Due to the elevated and exposed approach of the parcels of land means that effective mitigation cannot be achieved. Nothing has changed in the landscape since the last proposal.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
Representation ID: 106792
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Exhall Parish Council
Regarding the land proposed in Ardens Grafton and Temple Grafton Refid 16:
•The developments are in open countryside in an elevated area
•High visual impact
•Situated in Grade 1 & 2 agricultural land which is currently being actively farmed
•100% is within 25m of Rural listed buildings
Objections to SG20 & Refid 562
•It is sited within an area of high visual impact
•Coalescence between Bidford and Ardens Grafton
•Land is currently actively farmed – grade 1 & 2
•2021 SHLAA Land Parcels previously rejected some of the proposed fields (BD03 & BD04) nominated in SG20 on the grounds of environmental suitability, landscape impact , settlement character and agricultural land quality . Due to the elevated and exposed approach of the parcels of land means that effective mitigation cannot be achieved. Nothing has changed in the landscape since the last proposal.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the How to Have Your Say chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
Representation ID: 107312
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Exhall Parish Council
Exhall PC had questions from residents about making comments on the SWLP portal which has proved to be very difficult due technical glitches and the broad range of questions requiring a response. The section for objections is limited to 100 words unless you upload a presentation or a pdf document, then the 100 words can be used to provide a summary of your uploaded document. There is an option to send objections directly to the council which doesn’t have a word limit.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG20 Question
Representation ID: 107313
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Exhall Parish Council
It is unclear how many homes might be accommodated in SG20 but the area is vast. Section 4.3 states it is important to define boundaries between settlements to distinguish between scales of settlements and the open countryside. SG20 is in open countryside and will coalesce with Ardens Grafton. It is also an elevated area of high visual impact.
The chosen Spatial Growth Strategy is "Sustainable Travel and Economy". Bidford has expanded significantly but the nearest train station is in Honeybourne. When Bidford bridge is closed, rail users from Bidford and north of the river need to detour via Welford bridge. This has also been shut on numerous occasions due to flooding, via Barton is unpassable when the river overspills its banks. Bidford does not have a secondary school within a 2km walk to support sustainable travel. The nearest secondary schools are in Alcester, Stratford-upon-Avon and Chipping Campden.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
Representation ID: 107314
Received: 03/03/2025
Respondent: Exhall Parish Council
There is a submission under Refid 16 which will affect the villages of Exhall & Ardens Grafton given the elevated location of the fields in an area of high visual impact. It is also important to note that whilst being in the parish of Exhall the proposal falls under the village of Ardens Grafton which is a non-service village.