Preferred Options 2025

Search representations

Results for Gaydon Resident's Group search

New search New search

No

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG14 Question

Representation ID: 93355

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Gaydon Resident's Group

Representation Summary:

The proposed developments at SG14 would cause significant harm to the rural landscape, destroying greenfield sites and wildlife habitats in an area already experiencing over development. These areas lack rail connectivity, contradicting the Local Plan’s sustainability objectives. Existing road infrastructure is already congested, with no viable alternatives. Justifying development based on a single employer is flawed. Equally, continued commercial development to retrospectively justify over-population risks dramatic consequences including flooding and air pollution. Allowing these proposals sets a dangerous precedent. They fail to align with sustainable growth principles, overburden infrastructure, and permanently alter the countryside, making them inappropriate and unsustainable.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Strategic Growth Location SG13 Question

Representation ID: 93357

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Gaydon Resident's Group

Representation Summary:

The proposed developments at SG13 would cause significant harm to the rural landscape, destroying greenfield sites and wildlife habitats in an area already experiencing over development. These areas lack rail connectivity, contradicting the Local Plan’s sustainability objectives. Existing road infrastructure is already congested, with no viable alternatives. Justifying development based on a single employer is flawed. Equally, continued commercial development to retrospectively justify over-population risks dramatic consequences including flooding and air pollution. Allowing these proposals sets a dangerous precedent. They fail to align with sustainable growth principles, overburden infrastructure, and permanently alter the countryside, making them inappropriate and unsustainable.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 12-Locations for Employment Growth?

Representation ID: 93374

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Gaydon Resident's Group

Representation Summary:

I am concerned that the current planning approach focuses too heavily on short-term, large-scale commercial developments, following an outdated economic model based on GDP and growth. This overlooks the increasing importance of small businesses, self-employment, and industries that foster long-term thriving over mere growth. Additionally, infrastructure, such as transport and flood risk management, is insufficient for the scale of development proposed. The lack of attention to aesthetics also undermines the creation of vibrant, desirable places. Planning should focus on fostering diverse, adaptable communities, supporting independent businesses, and building environments that balance economic growth with quality of life.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.