Preferred Options 2025

No

Representation ID: 104222

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

Representation ID: 104224

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.

No

Representation ID: 104226

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.

Other

Representation ID: 104245

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

The proposed increase in housing in both Warwick and Stratford Districts will place a significant burden on already pressured healthcare services. This is a serious concern to SWFT and if not fully mitigated will put existing services at risk.

We therefore strongly support statements in the plan requiring full mitigation of significant negative impacts on healthcare services from new proposed developments, as well as the high priority given to healthy, sustainable communities.

However, the urban development of green belt land is not something SWFT would support as a priority for development, as this comes at the expense of long-term sustainability.

Other

Representation ID: 104281

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

We have included specific comments in the developments below related to individual locations, however the following general points apply to all of the locations so that SWFT are able to continue to deliver safe services for South Warwickshire residents.

- requirement for investment in healthcare infrastructure and services, including NHS Trusts and primary care
- requirement for investment in transport infrastructure
- ensure no detrimental impact on inequalities
- SWFT would not support prioritisation of development on green belt land or woodlands unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration.

No

Representation ID: 104287

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development includes woodland areas and is on green belt land we would suggest this site should not be a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.

No

Representation ID: 104292

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development includes woodland areas and is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.

No

Representation ID: 104297

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

Representation ID: 104302

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.

Other

Representation ID: 104304

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.