Publication Draft

Search representations

Results for Lenco Investments search

New search New search

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?

Representation ID: 33857

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

There is a lack of recognition of the economic relationship which occurs between Warwick District and Coventry City, particularly given the concentration of employment opportunities on the northern edge of the District.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?

Representation ID: 33858

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Strategy does not go far enough in recognising the availability of additional development land adjacent to Coventry City, particularly south of Baginton.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?

Representation ID: 33859

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Suggest adding:

"Reduce the need to travel by locating new housing growth close to existing major employment locations"

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?

Representation ID: 33860

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

There is a need to identify further land for employment as there is a shortfall of some 18ha against draft RSS figures. There is also likely to be a requirement from Coventry City.

It is appropriate therefore to re-allocate the land south of Finham as a strategic hi-tech employment location and redistribute the housing elsewhere.

Support

Publication Draft

(iv) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham

Representation ID: 33861

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Land south of Finham should be considered for office/hi-tech employment uses as opposed to mixed uses, as the area has good access to the strategic road network and would be attractive to future employers. New jobs would provide a better balance for existing residents in the area.

This would enable land south of Baginton to be developed for residential purposes which is already in an employment growth area.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?

Representation ID: 33862

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Developing at appropriate levels in a highly sustainable village location at Baginton provides the opportunity to develop a mix of housing to meet local needs, secure a high level of affordable housing and greatly assist funding and providing local infrastructure and facilities.

A spatial strategy which allows a proportionate level of housing/employment and local needs growth at such a location, alongside peripheral development around the main towns provides an optimum development strategy.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for Rural Communities, particularly in respect of rural housing?

Representation ID: 33863

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Developing at appropriate levels in a highly sustainable village location at Baginton provides the opportunity to develop a mix of housing to meet local needs, secure a high level of affordable housing and greatly assist funding and providing local infrastructure and facilities.

A spatial strategy which allows a proportionate level of housing/employment and local needs growth at such a location, alongside peripheral development around the main towns provides an optimum development strategy.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?

Representation ID: 33864

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

The Preferred Options ignores local opinion as the second most popular option for growth at Baginton has been ignored.

The Council should take a more proactive approach to housing allocations and not review the Core Strategy in the event that windfalls come forward at a faster rate.

The land south of Baginton should be allocated as development would be acceptable in the landscape, and with additional mitigation measures the presence of the sewage works would not preclude development. Development could also be located to avoid noise and air quality issues from the Airport. Minerals would also be excavated during development.

Object

Publication Draft

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?

Representation ID: 33865

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Locating new housing close to major employment areas would significantly reduce the need for major new infrastructure provision.

Support

Publication Draft

Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?

Representation ID: 33866

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Lenco Investments

Agent: RPS Planning

Representation Summary:

Support

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.