Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice] search
New searchComment
Publication Draft
(viii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth
Representation ID: 33617
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
The proposed use of Green Belt.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
Representation ID: 33618
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Supports the strategy for applying the housing mix requirement flexibly.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Representation ID: 33619
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
There should be no increase in the affordable housing requirements until it can be fully proven that the level of provision can be achieved and that there is an identified, proven, need. In the current climate, the viability of a proposed development would be fundamentally, and adversely, affected by any further increase in requirement.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
Representation ID: 33621
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Supports the flexible approach to density being promoted and notes that this will place a greater emphasis on the quality, design, and placemaking of proposed layouts.
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?
Representation ID: 33622
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
This has been discussed at the Examination into the RSS Phase Two.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 33624
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
No mention has been made as to the future use of S106 Agreements. S106 and CIL may operate together.
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 33625
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Reserve the right to comment when further details/proposals are made available.
Comment
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Open Space?
Representation ID: 33626
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Clarification is requested on the relationship with the existing SPD.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Community Safety?
Representation ID: 33627
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Community Safety?
Representation ID: 33628
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
