Publication Draft
Search representations
Results for Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council search
New searchSupport
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?
Representation ID: 2939
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing affordable homes?
Representation ID: 2940
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Given the known and accepted need for significant amounts of Affordable Housing this council accepts the proposal to require 50% of site Affordable housing provision, provided:
* the thresholds for demanding that AH provision should be the same in both rural and urban areas
* AND provided that such requirement can be shown to be meeting measured need in that particular local area
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?
Representation ID: 2941
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
We support the concept of a range of densities which should provide a range of sizes and costs to meet varied needs and improve the overall appearance, balance and environment of any new developments.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to levels of housing growth higher than those proposed by the Preferred Options?
Representation ID: 2942
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
STRONGLY OBJECT - This area has a relatively poor supporting infrastructure, other than good motorway access, and it is our belief that the numbers already imposed/accepted are significantly in excess of local needs and are too accommodating of outflow from Birmingham, Coventry and other areas.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 2943
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Not enough detail provided of "WDC thoughts so far" - that comes later!
This council believes that it is inappropriate to choose locations for development without knowledge of what infrastructure changes would be considered essential/appropriate to support such proposals, AND of proposals in neighbouring district council areas that may produce pressures on WDC area infrastructure.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Infrastructure?
Representation ID: 2944
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Infrastructure information was needed to make a properly informed decision on options.
Object
Publication Draft
Do you think the Council should adopt the Community Infrastructure Levy approach to securing developer contributions?
Representation ID: 2945
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
The levy should be on a site-by-site basis according to:
* The infrastructure needs of that site
* AND the impact of that site on the wider geographic area
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Open Space?
Representation ID: 2946
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Open Space?
Representation ID: 2947
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Support but would have wished to have seen more details of the standards which will be set.
Support
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the Natural Environment?
Representation ID: 2948
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
YES - but should be amended to reflect the more balanced spread (four towns and south of Coventry) of development which we suggest earlier in this questionnaire.
