Alternative Sites Consultation

Search representations

Results for Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice] search

New search New search

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Kenilworth Wardens Cricket Club, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 45051

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Representation Summary:

Access would need to be to the away from the bend on Glasshouse Lane by locating it towards the southern boundary of the site. Visibility would again need to be checked to ensure that the required standards can be attained.

Site would generate additional traffic and impact existing roads and junctions. Site poorly related to public transport network. Distance to town centre may mean walking/cycling is limited.

Modelling would be required to identify scale of any highway improvements.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Woodside Training Centre, Glasshouse Lane, Kenilworth?

Representation ID: 45052

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Representation Summary:

Access would need to be provided towards the northern boundary of the site away from the apex of the bend of Glasshouse Lane. Notwithstanding this comment, the ability to attain suitable visibility would still need to be fully assessed.

Site would generate additional traffic and impact existing roads and junctions. Site poorly related to public transport network. Distance to town centre may mean walking/cycling is limited.

Modelling would be required to identify scale of any highway improvements.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?

Representation ID: 45053

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Representation Summary:

Potential Access from roads to the north of the site and pedestrian/cycle access from Church and Fieldgate Lane.

Highway impacts will all be channelled to the north of the site due to barriers elsewhere. Some of the site remote from public transport network. Role of walking and cycling may be limited due to proximity to town centre.

Site would need to be well served by public transport and good pedestrian cycle routes.

Modelling of the site would need to be undertaken and area wide traffic management safety improvements.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Glebe Farm, Cubbington?

Representation ID: 45054

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Representation Summary:

Any potential development on this site would limited by the number of potential access points to the existing highway network in this area. Unlikely that satisfactory accesses could be attained to serve development of entire site.
Would result in concentrated impacts on roads and at junctions in the vicinity.

Modelling of the site would need to be undertaken. Rerouting existing bus services would need to be considered. More direct and convenient links for cyclists to the town centre would need to be made.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Loes Farm, Guy's Cliffe, Warwick?

Representation ID: 45055

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Representation Summary:

There would appear to be five separate areas that make up this site. As such there are varied responses to what would be possible. Access would be some and not so for others.
Development to the south of the A46 would have most impact on the A429. Development would need to be modelled.
Some of the site has good access to existing bus and cycle/pedestrian routes.
Improvements to junctions and surrounding road network would be required along with bus and cycle network improvements/contributions.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Hurst Farm South, Burton Green?

Representation ID: 45056

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Representation Summary:

The location of the site limits the opportunity for access onto the strategic road
network, particularly in view of the proposed scale of development. Concerns over the potential impact of Crackley Lane.
Overall there is little or no scope for development of this land.
It has a poor relationship to the public transport network.
Surrounding roads would need to be substantially upgraded. Bus routes would need to be rerouted and good access to Tile Hill station for bus, pedestrians and cyclists would be required.

Comment

Alternative Sites Consultation

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Baginton?

Representation ID: 45057

Received: 09/04/2010

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Representation Summary:

This proposed site would impact significantly on the local and strategic highway network, with limited scope for suitable access provision or improvement. Limited existing bus routes in the area.
Existing barriers means pedestrian/cycle permeability will be challenging.
the level of necessary mitigation would be considerable. A new public transport network would need to be established.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.