Preferred Options

Support

Representation ID: 49189

Received: 26/07/2012

Respondent: The Sundial Group and Gleeson Developments

Number of people: 2

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support the approach to high quality design set out in PO10. Utilising the principles of sustainable Garden Suburbs as set out in the Council's Prospectus is supported by the NPPF

Support

Representation ID: 49190

Received: 26/07/2012

Respondent: The Sundial Group and Gleeson Developments

Number of people: 2

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

This recognises the fundamental need to provide, and the benefits of open space, provisions for sport and other outdoor facilities.

Existing sports land and playing fields should "not be built on unless an assessment has been undertaken which has clearly shown the land....to be surplus to requirements... or the loss...would be replaced by equivalent or better provision in terms of quantity and quality in a sustainable location."

Please refer to our objection to PO4 that proposes development on a significant area of playing fields at Thickthorn, Kenilworth - no such assessment or replacement facility has been set out.

Support

Representation ID: 49191

Received: 26/07/2012

Respondent: The Sundial Group and Gleeson Developments

Number of people: 2

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support this, especially in relation to altering the Green Belt boundary to the east of Kenilworth to accommodate development.

NPPF refers to need to review Green Belt boundaires to meet needs beyond the plan period. this review has not been carried out.

the amount of green belt in the District means it is necessary to safeguard land beyond the plan period - and this needs to include Kenilworth

Object

Representation ID: 49192

Received: 26/07/2012

Respondent: The Sundial Group and Gleeson Developments

Number of people: 2

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

If our arguments set out above in relation to Kenilworth are accepted Plan 4 should be amended accordingly to include K17 and AS1b.