Preferred Options

Search representations

Results for Trustees of the Haseley Settlement search

New search New search

Support

Preferred Options

Shrewley

Representation ID: 47971

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Support PO4 and development at Shrewley.
Map attached suggests site.

Support

Preferred Options

Hatton

Representation ID: 47973

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Support for development at Hatton.
Sustainable with range of services and publci transport.
Within easy reach of towns.

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options

5. Preferred Level of Growth

Representation ID: 47974

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Insufficient growth in line with evidence.
SHMAA indicates higher need.

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options

PO4: Distribution of Sites for Housing

Representation ID: 47976

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Support for Hatton as Category 2 village suitable for new development.
Good range of services and public transport to towns.
Green belt Boundary should be altered to allow development.

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options

PO5: Affordable Housing

Representation ID: 47977

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

40% affordable housing acceptable.
Smaller sites should be acceptable however where affordable housing not viable.

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options

10. Built Environment

Representation ID: 47978

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Accept policy PO10.
Should only be incorporated in sites where viable to do so.
Rural housing could be compomised if it doesn't meet all criteria.
Flexibility required in these cases.
Highest figure should be target.

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options

16. Green Belt

Representation ID: 47979

Received: 25/07/2012

Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement

Agent: RPS Planning & Development

Representation Summary:

Agree with removal of larger villages from green belt to allow development.
Location plan attached giving potential site boundary.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.