Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for Trustees of the Haseley Settlement search
New searchSupport
Preferred Options
Shrewley
Representation ID: 47971
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
Support PO4 and development at Shrewley.
Map attached suggests site.
Response forms submitted as electronic attachments.
Support
Preferred Options
Hatton
Representation ID: 47973
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
Support for development at Hatton.
Sustainable with range of services and publci transport.
Within easy reach of towns.
Letter and representation form attached electronically.
Object
Preferred Options
5. Preferred Level of Growth
Representation ID: 47974
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
Insufficient growth in line with evidence.
SHMAA indicates higher need.
Letter and representation form attached electronically.
Support
Preferred Options
PO4: Distribution of Sites for Housing
Representation ID: 47976
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
Support for Hatton as Category 2 village suitable for new development.
Good range of services and public transport to towns.
Green belt Boundary should be altered to allow development.
Letter and representation form attached electronically.
Support
Preferred Options
PO5: Affordable Housing
Representation ID: 47977
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
40% affordable housing acceptable.
Smaller sites should be acceptable however where affordable housing not viable.
Letter and representation form attached electronically.
Support
Preferred Options
10. Built Environment
Representation ID: 47978
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
Accept policy PO10.
Should only be incorporated in sites where viable to do so.
Rural housing could be compomised if it doesn't meet all criteria.
Flexibility required in these cases.
Highest figure should be target.
Letter and representation form attached electronically.
Support
Preferred Options
16. Green Belt
Representation ID: 47979
Received: 25/07/2012
Respondent: Trustees of the Haseley Settlement
Agent: RPS Planning & Development
Agree with removal of larger villages from green belt to allow development.
Location plan attached giving potential site boundary.
Letter and representation form attached electronically.
